The Economics of World War II 1998
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511523632.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The United Kingdom: ‘Victory at all costs’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In principle, some of the government spending on the war effort, which is included negatively as a direct cost by Bogart (1920) should actually enter positively in the national balance sheet, contributing to intangible physical capital in the form of cumulated research and development spending and to intangible human capital in the form of spending on health and mobility. However, in practice, Broadberry and Howlett (1998) found that these effects were very small even during World War II. During World War I, these positive effects were difficult to discern at all in the British case.…”
Section: Physical Capital Losses and Changing National Wealthmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In principle, some of the government spending on the war effort, which is included negatively as a direct cost by Bogart (1920) should actually enter positively in the national balance sheet, contributing to intangible physical capital in the form of cumulated research and development spending and to intangible human capital in the form of spending on health and mobility. However, in practice, Broadberry and Howlett (1998) found that these effects were very small even during World War II. During World War I, these positive effects were difficult to discern at all in the British case.…”
Section: Physical Capital Losses and Changing National Wealthmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is an issue which can be addressed in the national balance sheet approach. Broadberry and Howlett (1998) provide an accounting framework for evaluating the long run impact of war on wealth, which is based on national balance sheets. The first important distinction is between stocks and flows in the system of national accounts.…”
Section: Insert Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to forming a basis for the international comparison of the major combatant countries during World War I, which is the main aim of this book, this chapter also provides the material for a contrast between the British war efforts during the two World Wars, since the framework draws heavily on our earlier study of World War II (Broadberry and Howlett, 1998;2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Fontvieille (1976) concluded that the two World Wars did not gave place to higher public expenditures in France once military spending and war-related costs are excluded from the accounts. Similarly, Broadberry and Howlett (1998) argued that the Second World War did not bring about major increases in social expenditures in Great Britain, while Broadberry and Harrison (2005) conclude that the First World War did not end up with major increases in civilian expenditures (once debt services are excluded).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%