2007
DOI: 10.1177/0142064x07078993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Unity of Luke—Acts in Recent Discussion

Abstract: This article surveys the debate about the unity of Luke-Acts in recent scholarship. The study concentrates on monographs and articles written after Mikael C. Parsons and Richard I. Pervo's volume Rethinking the Unity of Luke and Acts, and identifies the recent contribution that reception-history studies have brought to the debate. This is followed with a brief analysis of the flashpoints in the debate, and a discussion of what is at stake for Lukan studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Minear and Gaventa's observations are relevant not only for individual books but also for a collection of writings with subject matter demonstrably and deliberately in common (Frye 1990). The fact that scholarship perceives some form of literary connectedness, ranging from the trivial to the substantial, between Luke's gospel and Acts (see Bird 2007;Spencer 2007) suggests, according to Northrop Frye's logic, the existence of a text-based 'conceptual unity' governing these writings (Frye 1990:xii). Frye's analysis of the Bible's function in English literature has led him to reject the perception that the Bible is a grab-bag anthology in favour of the view that it is a source of a period's 'mythology' (nota bene Frye's definition of mythology) which expresses a meta-belief informed within a cultural and psychological context (Frye 1990:xii−xxiii, 31−52).…”
Section: The Feasibility Of the Collective Analysis Of Luke And Actsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minear and Gaventa's observations are relevant not only for individual books but also for a collection of writings with subject matter demonstrably and deliberately in common (Frye 1990). The fact that scholarship perceives some form of literary connectedness, ranging from the trivial to the substantial, between Luke's gospel and Acts (see Bird 2007;Spencer 2007) suggests, according to Northrop Frye's logic, the existence of a text-based 'conceptual unity' governing these writings (Frye 1990:xii). Frye's analysis of the Bible's function in English literature has led him to reject the perception that the Bible is a grab-bag anthology in favour of the view that it is a source of a period's 'mythology' (nota bene Frye's definition of mythology) which expresses a meta-belief informed within a cultural and psychological context (Frye 1990:xii−xxiii, 31−52).…”
Section: The Feasibility Of the Collective Analysis Of Luke And Actsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 See the preceding note on my approach to the relationship between Luke and Acts. On the broader debate, see (Bird 2007). 10 This is not to suggest, incidentally, that the purpose of Luke's prologue is entirely evident.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%