2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The unity of opposites: Strategic interplay between bacterial effectors to regulate cellular homeostasis

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
(290 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of bacterial toxins discovered to specifically direct their activity toward altering Rab biology is on the rise. SidM (also known as DrrA), LepB, and Lgp0393 of Legionella pneumophila, SopE, SopE2, and SopD2 of Salmonella enterica, EspG of Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, and VirA of Shigella flexneri mimic host regulators that alter the Rab activation state [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] In this study, we show unlike any other effectors that target Rabs, MCF is delivered from a toxin expressed by an extracellular bacterium to cleave and degrade a broad range of Rab GTPases, which ultimately results in fragmentation of the Golgi and mitochondrial damage (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of bacterial toxins discovered to specifically direct their activity toward altering Rab biology is on the rise. SidM (also known as DrrA), LepB, and Lgp0393 of Legionella pneumophila, SopE, SopE2, and SopD2 of Salmonella enterica, EspG of Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, and VirA of Shigella flexneri mimic host regulators that alter the Rab activation state [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] In this study, we show unlike any other effectors that target Rabs, MCF is delivered from a toxin expressed by an extracellular bacterium to cleave and degrade a broad range of Rab GTPases, which ultimately results in fragmentation of the Golgi and mitochondrial damage (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other effectors covalently modify Rabs through AMPylation (L. pneumophila SidM), Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoS), and ubiquitination (L. pneumophila SidE, SdeA, SdeB, and SdeC). All of these covalent modification prevent nucleotide exchange or interaction with GAPs, GEFs, or Rab effectors39,44,45,47,[50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60] . However, only the Type III secretion effector GtgE of S. enterica has been found to directly cleave Rabs to date48,[61][62][63] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balanced modulation of host processes has recently emerged as a prominent feature associated with the interactions between L. pneumophila and its hosts. In some cases, the balance is achieved by effector pairs with opposite biochemical activity which may function at different phases of infection [52]. In other cases, the importance of balance lies in the cellular locations of the molecular events regulated by the effectors [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both post-translational modifications can subsequently be reversed by the antagonistic effectors SidD and Lem3, respectively [105][106][107]. A growing list of similar antagonistic effector relationships highlights how the effector arsenal equips the bacteria to exert exact temporal and spatial control of host protein activity (reviewed in [108]). Moreover, the observation that co-expression but not individual expression of the effectors SidP and Lem14 inhibits yeast growth indicates that synergistic interactions also exist [109].…”
Section: General Concepts and Functional Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%