2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01925-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The unknown human trophectoderm: implication for biopsy at the blastocyst stage

Abstract: Trophectoderm biopsy is increasingly performed for pre-implantation genetic testing of aneuploidies and considered a safe procedure on short-term clinical outcome, without strong assessment of long-term consequences. Poor biological information on human trophectoderm is available due to ethical restrictions. Therefore, most studies have been conducted in vitro (choriocarcinoma cell lines, embryonic and pluripotent stem cells) and on murine models that nevertheless poorly reflect the human counterpart. Polariza… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, to undertake fertility treatment for the sole purpose of selecting an embryo that has marginally lower risk of developing a late-onset polygenic condition appears counterproductive and is likely to result in an overall reduced chance of a healthy life. A similar argument can be made in relation to trophectoderm biopsy, which itself appears to produce higher risks of adverse outcomes in an offspring ( Cimadomo et al , 2016 ; Zacchini et al , 2017 ; Tocci, 2020 ). Therefore, an offspring that is born as a result of PRS-ES, where ART is undertaken for the singular purpose of embryo selection based on this technology, may end up having a less healthy life, compared to a naturally conceived individual.…”
Section: Ethical and Social Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Therefore, to undertake fertility treatment for the sole purpose of selecting an embryo that has marginally lower risk of developing a late-onset polygenic condition appears counterproductive and is likely to result in an overall reduced chance of a healthy life. A similar argument can be made in relation to trophectoderm biopsy, which itself appears to produce higher risks of adverse outcomes in an offspring ( Cimadomo et al , 2016 ; Zacchini et al , 2017 ; Tocci, 2020 ). Therefore, an offspring that is born as a result of PRS-ES, where ART is undertaken for the singular purpose of embryo selection based on this technology, may end up having a less healthy life, compared to a naturally conceived individual.…”
Section: Ethical and Social Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…To further characterize TE‐like cells derived from human EPSCs, naive hPSCs, primed hPSCs and hTSCs, we analysed the expression of all genes with upregulated expression in the TE lineage 44 . The expression levels of TE‐like cells derived from human EPSCs and 2iLGöY 30 and PXGL 9 naive hPSCs were much higher than those of other cells, even compared with those of hTSCs (Figure 2A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current gold standard methods require a biopsy to obtain genetic material from the developing embryo. Potential risk of compromising embryo development, long-term consequences [ 3 , 4 ] and associated high costs with the biopsy procedure have encouraged scientists to investigate options for a noninvasive PGT (niPGT), correlating genetic material found in blastocoele fluid (BF) and spent blastocyst media (SBM) to the one in trophectoderm (TE) following the biopsy. A recent review was published on the current advancements in the field niPGT testing for the identification of embryo ploidy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%