1977
DOI: 10.1002/macp.1977.021781208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The unperturbed dimensions of poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate)

Abstract: Values of the unperturbed dimensions of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) have been determined in five non-ideal solvents using viscometric data and a number of different theoretical treatments. Values of the steric factor 0, the characteristic ratio C, and the expansion factor r were also calculated. There was some variation of all these parameters with solvent but on the whole they were comparable to values for polymethacrylates with non-polar side groups of a similar size.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of x and M" used to calculate Mc in Figure 1 are consistent with those reported by Fort and Polyzoidis. 64 We and clearly reveals that Mc is far more sensitive to than Mn, particularly for the lightly cross-linked gels at the highest value of used in these calculations ( = 0.461). In view of these results, we used Ma = 75000_and the average value of = 0.375 in our final calculations in X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values of x and M" used to calculate Mc in Figure 1 are consistent with those reported by Fort and Polyzoidis. 64 We and clearly reveals that Mc is far more sensitive to than Mn, particularly for the lightly cross-linked gels at the highest value of used in these calculations ( = 0.461). In view of these results, we used Ma = 75000_and the average value of = 0.375 in our final calculations in X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We assumed these values of polymer molecular weights in the calculation of since values of a corresponding to these polymer molecular weights were available from Fort and Polyzoidis. 64 The value of x in their calculations ranged from 0.37 to 0.461. We examined the variation in Mc as a function of varying x and M" (Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%