2017
DOI: 10.1101/218776
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The unrealized potential of herbaria for global change biology

Abstract: 3Plant and fungal specimens in herbaria are becoming primary resources for investigating how inferences across spatial, temporal, and phylogenetic dimensions. However, these specimens

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
71
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
(159 reference statements)
2
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, equivalent data from herbarium specimens on plant-pollinator interactions (e.g., from pollen preserved in specimens; Pauw & Hawkins, 2011) and plant-pathogen interactions (e.g., from pathogen DNA or morphology; Antonovics, Hood, Thrall, Abrams, & Duthie, 2003) may be used to further tailor land management strategies to changing environmental conditions. However, data from herbaria present challenges that require careful consideration (e.g., see Meyer, Weigelt, & Kreft, 2016;Daru et al, 2018;Meineke et al, 2018). The spatial resolution of older specimens is coarse and, in our data, limited to the county level within the US.…”
Section: Benefits and Drawbacks Of Museum Specimens For Characterizmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, equivalent data from herbarium specimens on plant-pollinator interactions (e.g., from pollen preserved in specimens; Pauw & Hawkins, 2011) and plant-pathogen interactions (e.g., from pathogen DNA or morphology; Antonovics, Hood, Thrall, Abrams, & Duthie, 2003) may be used to further tailor land management strategies to changing environmental conditions. However, data from herbaria present challenges that require careful consideration (e.g., see Meyer, Weigelt, & Kreft, 2016;Daru et al, 2018;Meineke et al, 2018). The spatial resolution of older specimens is coarse and, in our data, limited to the county level within the US.…”
Section: Benefits and Drawbacks Of Museum Specimens For Characterizmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We scored herbivory by overlaying a grid of 5 cm by 5 cm cells, and scoring presence (1) or absence (0) of damage in five randomly selected grid cells, ensuring that selected cells had at least onefourth leaf cover (Meineke, Davis, & Davies, 2018). We focused on "chewing"-leaf removal by herbivores with mandibles, likely including Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), Coleoptera (beetles), and Orthoptera (grasshoppers and their relatives)-because it was the most common type of herbivory on specimens and is the subject of most ecological studies on herbivory (Turcotte et al, 2014).…”
Section: Quantifying Herbivory On Herbarium Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These plant specimens provide crucial data for the study of plant diversity, ecology, evolution, genetics, and biodiversity, to name only a few (Graham et al, 2004). When herbarium specimens are "digitized"-converted into a digital format by imaging and transcription of label data-they have even greater potential for answering major research questions related to the recent impact of humanity on biodiversity (Davis et al, 2015;Soltis, 2017;James et al, 2018;Meineke et al, 2018;Soltis et al, 2018). These millions of herbarium records have accumulated a valuable heritage and knowledge of plants over centuries, across all continents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical bias in long-term phenology data is that they are available primarily for temperate regions and only in rare cases for the tropics, where most plant diversity occurs. One potential way to overcome the constraints of long-term field observational data on phenophases is by using historical records in herbaria and museums (Davis et al, 2015;Meineke et al, 2018aMeineke et al, , 2019. Although such records have not necessarily been collected expressly for phenological investigations, and therefore present their own biases (Daru et al, 2018;Panchen et al, 2019), a significant body of literature now exists in which historical records have potential for investigating climaterelated phenological trends across plant species (Primack et al, 2004;Bolmgren and Lonnberg, 2005;Coleman and Brawley, 2005;Lavoie and Lachance, 2006;Miller-Rushing et al, 2006;Bowers, 2007;Houle, 2007;Kauserud et al, 2008;Gallagher et al, 2009;Neil et al, 2010;Park and Mazer, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%