2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3178156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Unrealized Promise of Forensic Science -- An Empirical Study of its Production and Use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The interdependence between the police and crime lab we documented in this study is concerning because the discipline of forensic science is supposed to be independent and autonomous from law enforcement, as noted by the National Academy of Sciences ( 2009): "Forensic science serves more than just law enforcement; and when it does serve law enforcement, it must be equally available to law enforcement officers prosecutors, and defendants in the criminal justice system" (p. 17, emphases in original). The fairness of the criminal justice system depends, in part, on the objective neutrality of forensic science, as Anderson et al (2018) explained, By being relatively independent of the conventional police investigative process, it can, in theory, provide a decoupled check and reduce errors of both inclusion and exclusion-that is both the wrongfully convicted and the wrongfully acquitted. (p. 47) In this community, the municipal crime lab was, in practice, neither independent nor functionally autonomous from law enforcement personnel with respect to SAK submission decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interdependence between the police and crime lab we documented in this study is concerning because the discipline of forensic science is supposed to be independent and autonomous from law enforcement, as noted by the National Academy of Sciences ( 2009): "Forensic science serves more than just law enforcement; and when it does serve law enforcement, it must be equally available to law enforcement officers prosecutors, and defendants in the criminal justice system" (p. 17, emphases in original). The fairness of the criminal justice system depends, in part, on the objective neutrality of forensic science, as Anderson et al (2018) explained, By being relatively independent of the conventional police investigative process, it can, in theory, provide a decoupled check and reduce errors of both inclusion and exclusion-that is both the wrongfully convicted and the wrongfully acquitted. (p. 47) In this community, the municipal crime lab was, in practice, neither independent nor functionally autonomous from law enforcement personnel with respect to SAK submission decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that research design, Briody [29][30][31][32]) was able to assess the effects of DNA evidence on court decision and defendant confessions. For the first three categories, he found, among other things, that DNA evidence: "emerged as a positive predictor that prosecutors would pursue cases in court, and it demonstrated a powerful influence on jury decisions to convict" ([31]: 1; see also [33]).…”
Section: Dna Databases' Contribution To National Criminal Justice Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"The data show that in 3% of the SC-cases and in 1% of the HVCcases, the DNA from the crime scene yielded a "cold hit" in the DNA database leading law enforcement to a suspect in a case, which had no previous suspects" ( [35]: 855; see also [33]).…”
Section: Dna Databases' Contribution To National Criminal Justice Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The potential of crime scene forensics for solving crimes is undermined if the police agency's evidence processing capabilities cannot effectively handle the demand. Anderson, Matthies, Greathouse, and Chari () recently found that the full potential of forensic science in criminal investigations remains unrealized. Evidence is analyzed in only a small percentage of cases, and it occurs more commonly for case building after an arrest rather than as a means of identifying the offender.…”
Section: What Police Investigators Domentioning
confidence: 99%