2018
DOI: 10.1080/07380569.2018.1429168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Unseen Digital Divide: Urban, Suburban, and Rural Teacher Use and Perceptions of Web-Based Classroom Technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kale and Goh's (2014) study on teachers from rural and urban areas revealed that despite holding similar beliefs about technology integration and having the same access to Web 2.0 tools, the rural teachers made little use of these tools compared to urban teachers. In Kormos' (2018) study, a comparison of urban, rural and suburban teachers' use of web-based applications showed these tools were utilized more by suburban teachers compared to teachers from the other two groups. Wood and Howley (2012) found that suburban teachers' use of technology were more sophisticated compared to teachers from rural or urban schools.…”
Section: A Factors Affecting Effective Ict In Education Implementationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kale and Goh's (2014) study on teachers from rural and urban areas revealed that despite holding similar beliefs about technology integration and having the same access to Web 2.0 tools, the rural teachers made little use of these tools compared to urban teachers. In Kormos' (2018) study, a comparison of urban, rural and suburban teachers' use of web-based applications showed these tools were utilized more by suburban teachers compared to teachers from the other two groups. Wood and Howley (2012) found that suburban teachers' use of technology were more sophisticated compared to teachers from rural or urban schools.…”
Section: A Factors Affecting Effective Ict In Education Implementationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recent literature highlights the divide in terms of educational setting including the rural and urban areas (Howley, Wood & Hough, 2011;Kale & Goh, 2014;Kormos, 2018;Wood & Howley, 2012). Kale and Goh's (2014) study on teachers from rural and urban areas revealed that despite holding similar beliefs about technology integration and having the same access to Web 2.0 tools, the rural teachers made little use of these tools compared to urban teachers.…”
Section: A Factors Affecting Effective Ict In Education Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like their nonrural counterparts, rural teachers who spend more time on professional development have greater pedagogical knowledge, suggesting increasing professional development time may boost knowledge of instructional practices (Glover et al, 2016). In a quantitative study investigating the technology use and perceptions of teachers in different communities, those in suburban schools indicated the highest perceptions of technology effectiveness, followed by their rural peers (Kormos, 2018). Teacher educators can benefit from this insight in identifying effective technologies and working to improve the use of technology in preparatory courses.…”
Section: Professional Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using technology to impact teaching and learning is common in most classrooms (Lemon, 2016). The benefits of the technological experience for students is evident in research (Cheung & Slavin, 2012;Kormos, 2018); however, the theoretical concepts for teaching and learning are strained by the inequity of resources in rural communities, teaching capacity in schools, and the technology literacy of teachers and students. Communities of practice (CoPs) offer a theoretical framework for involving in-service teachers in instructional practices, including the use of Twitter, to help address the challenges of rural educators.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation