2013
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.12260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The unstructured domain of colicin N kills Escherichia coli

Abstract: Bacteria often produce toxins which kill competing bacteria. Colicins, produced by and toxic to Escherichia coli bacteria are three-domain proteins so efficient that one molecule can kill a cell. The C-terminal domain carries the lethal activity and the central domain is required for surface receptor binding. The N-terminal domain, required for translocation across the outer membrane, is always intrinsically unstructured. It has always been assumed therefore that the C-terminal cytotoxic domain is required for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This arrangement would position the unstructured N‐terminal T domain to search for a nearby opening in one of the ∼ 10 5 copies of OmpF. As has been shown to occur for the T domains of colicin E3 and E9 and suggested by the colicin N resistance of OmpF mutant G119N (Fourel et al ., ; Housden et al ., 2005; 2010; 2013; Yamashita et al ., ), the T domain could then thread into one of the three pores of the trimeric OmpF, using the recently identified OBS of colicin N to bind within the pore (Johnson et al ., ). Once the unfolded T domain has threaded through a pore of OmpF, presumably via some sort of pushing/pulling mechanism (Housden et al ., ; Thoren and Krantz, ), the TolA binding site on the T domain (Raggett et al ., ) would be exposed in the periplasm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This arrangement would position the unstructured N‐terminal T domain to search for a nearby opening in one of the ∼ 10 5 copies of OmpF. As has been shown to occur for the T domains of colicin E3 and E9 and suggested by the colicin N resistance of OmpF mutant G119N (Fourel et al ., ; Housden et al ., 2005; 2010; 2013; Yamashita et al ., ), the T domain could then thread into one of the three pores of the trimeric OmpF, using the recently identified OBS of colicin N to bind within the pore (Johnson et al ., ). Once the unfolded T domain has threaded through a pore of OmpF, presumably via some sort of pushing/pulling mechanism (Housden et al ., ; Thoren and Krantz, ), the TolA binding site on the T domain (Raggett et al ., ) would be exposed in the periplasm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To define the in vivo effects more precisely we studied the kinetics of ColN activity which can be accurately followed in real time by using an ion‐selective electrode to measure the release of intracellular potassium from affected cells. We used this extremely sensitive assay (Johnson et al ., ) to measure the in vivo activity of ColN on various Keio (Baba et al ., ) LPS synthetic pathway mutants. First, the K + efflux measurements confirmed that Δ waaF cells, which fail to add the either HepII or HepIII, which we now have shown by STD‐NMR to be involved in ColN‐R binding, were resistant to ColN (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ColN was shown to bind directly to OmpF by ITC but a chymotryptic fragment missing the N‐terminal 67 residues of the T‐domain or the isolated R‐domain alone showed much lower affinity (Evans et al ., 1996a). After the OBS in ColE9 was identified at the tip of the disordered T‐domain (Housden et al ., ), the site of the strong OmpF interaction in ColN was also pinpointed as a linear OBS epitope at the extreme N‐terminus (Johnson et al ., ). However, whereas a point mutation in OBS (F14G) was enough to abolish in vitro OmpF binding it hardly affected ColN activity (Johnson et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations