1976
DOI: 10.1029/ja081i001p00205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The upper- and lower-frequency cutoffs of magnetospherically reflected whistlers

Abstract: The upper‐frequency cutoffs of magnetospherically reflected (MR) whistlers observed by the Ogo 1 and 3 satellites are explained in terms of trapping of the upper‐frequency components above the cutoff by sharp density gradients across L shells. The lower‐frequency cutoffs are interpreted in terms of wave guide attenuation and D region absorption of the atmospheric source energy and defocusing of the MR whistler energy in the magnetosphere.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
77
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a discussion of the conditions required for ducted propagation, see Smith et al (1960) and Helliwell (1965). Most whistlers observed on the ground are believed to be caused by ducted propagation, whereas most whistlers observed via spacecraft are believed to be caused by nonducted propagation (Smith and Angerami, 1968;Edgar, 1976). Whistlers observed on the ground are primarily due to ducted propagation because a ducted whistler arrives in the opposite hemisphere with the wave vector nearly vertical, thereby allowing it to be transmitted through the ionosphere to the ground.…”
Section: Whistlersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a discussion of the conditions required for ducted propagation, see Smith et al (1960) and Helliwell (1965). Most whistlers observed on the ground are believed to be caused by ducted propagation, whereas most whistlers observed via spacecraft are believed to be caused by nonducted propagation (Smith and Angerami, 1968;Edgar, 1976). Whistlers observed on the ground are primarily due to ducted propagation because a ducted whistler arrives in the opposite hemisphere with the wave vector nearly vertical, thereby allowing it to be transmitted through the ionosphere to the ground.…”
Section: Whistlersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical whistler ducts are thought to have cross-sectional dimensions ranging from 50 to 500 km (Smith and Angerami, 1968). Although the dispersion properties of nonducted whistlers are somewhat different than ducted whistlers (Edgar, 1976), nose-like features, such as in Fig. 2, occur whenever a nonducted whistler has crossed the magnetic equator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They called this phenomenon Nu whistler and suggested its basic mechanism. According to these authors, the minimum frequency on a Nu-whistler spectrogram, where the two branches merge, corresponds to the wave that undergoes magnetospheric reflection at the observation point (see also Edgar, 1976). Magnetospheric reflection occurs when the waves reach some point where their frequency is less than the local lower-hybrid-resonance (LHR) frequency, so it is also referred to as LHR reflection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated previously, the dispersion depends on several parameters, such as the intensity of the ambient magnetic field, the electron density, and the path length along the propagation paths. The path length between the source point of lightning strikes and the observation point in the Earth's plasmasphere affects the dispersion scale of lightning whistlers [9], [16]. Short path lengths lead to minimum dispersion, and vice versa [9], [16].…”
Section: Dispersion Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The path length between the source point of lightning strikes and the observation point in the Earth's plasmasphere affects the dispersion scale of lightning whistlers [9], [16]. Short path lengths lead to minimum dispersion, and vice versa [9], [16]. Furthermore, to estimate the path length, we can utilize a simple method by assuming that the structure of the Earth's magnetic field is approximated by a simple magnetic dipole model [17], [18].…”
Section: Dispersion Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%