2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Upper Paleolithic hard animal tissue under the microscope: Selected examples from Moravian sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When differentiating human from nonhuman bone, histologists generally focus on the presence or absence of key histological structures such as primary fibrolamellar plexiform bone or osteon banding [e.g. [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Alternatives to qualitative observation have been explored more recently, including histomorphometric variation to differentiate human from nonhuman bone [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When differentiating human from nonhuman bone, histologists generally focus on the presence or absence of key histological structures such as primary fibrolamellar plexiform bone or osteon banding [e.g. [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Alternatives to qualitative observation have been explored more recently, including histomorphometric variation to differentiate human from nonhuman bone [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histomorphometric techniques use measurements of microstructural features, such as osteon circularity or osteon area, to differentiate human from nonhuman bone (Cattaneo et al, 1999; Dominguez & Crowder, 2012; Jowsey, 1966; Martiniaková et al, 2007; Urbanová & Novotny, 2005). Although these techniques have previously been attempted in archaeological contexts (Gigante et al, 2021; Sázelová et al, 2021), they were developed on samples of known anatomical position and have not been validated on fragmentary bone of unknown anatomical location. Variation in osteon size and geometry has been documented across elements and even within histological sections; therefore, controlling for anatomical location is essential (Cummaudo et al, 2018; Nganvongpanit et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histomorphological techniques use qualitative observations of bone microstructure and have been employed successfully in both forensic and archaeological contexts to differentiate human from nonhuman skeletal remains (Cuijpers, 2006(Cuijpers, , 2009Dixon et al, 2011;Gigante et al, 2021;Hanson & Cain, 2007;Owsley et al, 1985;Sawada et al, 2014;Sázelová et al, 2021). Species differentiation by histomorphology is based on long-held observations that bone modeling rate determines primary bone organization (Amprino, 1947;de Margerie et al, 2002de Margerie et al, , 2004.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it would provide additional and complementary information to that obtained through the study of different organic and inorganic materials by archaeological scientists. Through this, it is possible obtain direct information about previous populations 16,17 , historical events 18,19 , and past human and animal behaviours [20][21][22][23] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%