2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1185245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ups and Downs of Modeling Financial Time Series with Wiener Process Mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of[28] reach a similar conclusion in the most recent update (v3) of their paper. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2010/02/P02018…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors of[28] reach a similar conclusion in the most recent update (v3) of their paper. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2010/02/P02018…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…In particular, the class of scaling functions from which one can construct joint PDFs is specified. This class includes the form used in [21] and also the Student distribution recently considered 1 in [28].…”
Section: Non-markovian Self-similar Stochastic Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4). This is indeed the case if we choose an inverse-gamma distribution for σ 2 [6]. Equivalently, we may set…”
Section: Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a version of our model suited for describing single, long time series of returns [15,19], the necessity to consider random exogenous factors influencing the market, leads us to switch-on at random times some time-inhomogeneities formally similar to those characterizing the model of the previous Section. This is achieved by setting a t = 1 concomitantly with these random events (See also [2,3,6,1]). In such a context it is not a priori clear whether or not the start of an Omori process should imply putting a t = 1 in correspondence with the time t of the main shock.…”
Section: Aftershock Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation