The Uptake and Use of Telemonitoring in Chronic Care Between 2014 and 2019: Nationwide Survey Among Patients and Health Care Professionals in the Netherlands

Abstract

Background Telemonitoring could offer solutions to the mounting challenges for health care and could improve patient self-management. Studies have addressed the benefits and challenges of telemonitoring for certain patient groups. Objective This paper will examine the nationwide uptake of telemonitoring in chronic care in the Netherlands from 2014 to 2019 by means of an annual representative survey among patients and health care professionals. Methods Between 2014 and 2019, approximately 2900 patients with chronic diseases, 700 nurses, and 500 general practitioners (GPs) and medical specialists received a questionnaire. About 30 questions addressed topics about the use of eHealth and experiences with it, including data about telemonitoring. Results Between 2014 and 2019, the use of telemonitoring remained stable for all groups except medical specialists. In medical specialist departments, the use of telemonitoring increased from 11.2% (18/161) in 2014 to 19.6% (36/184) in 2019 (χ24=12.3; P=.02). In 2019, telemonitoring was used by 5.8% (28/485) of people with chronic disease. This was 18.2% (41/225) in GP organizations and 40.4% (44/109), 38.0% (78/205), and 8.9% (29/325) in the organizations of nurses working in primary, secondary, and elderly care, respectively. Up to 10% of the targeted patient group such as diabetics were regarded by health care professionals as suitable for using telemonitoring. The main benefits mentioned by the patients were “comfort” (421/1043, 40.4%) and “living at home for longer/more comfortably” (334/1047, 31.9%). Health care professionals added “improvement of self-management” (63/176, 35.8% to 57/71, 80.3%), “better understanding of the patient’s condition” (47/176, 26.7% to 42/71, 59.2%), “reduction of workload” (53/134, 39.6% of nurses in elderly care), “better tailoring of care plan to the patient’s situation” (95/225, 42.2% of GPs), and “saves time for patients/caregivers” (61/176, 34.7% of medical specialists). Disadvantages mentioned by professionals were that “it takes time to monitor data” (13/130, 10% to 108/225, 48.0%), “it takes time to follow up alerts” (15/130, 11.5% to 117/225, 52.0%), and “it is difficult to estimate which patients can work with telemonitoring” (22/113, 19.5% to 94/225, 41.8%). Conclusions The uptake of telemonitoring in Dutch chronic care remained stable during 2014-2019 but increased among medical specialists. According to both patients and professionals, telemonitoring improves the quality of life and quality of care. Skills for suitably including eligible patients and for allocating the tasks of data monitoring and follow-up care within the team would help to further increase the use of telemonitoring.

Remote Home Monitoring of Continuous Vital Sign Measurements by Wearables in Patients Discharged After Colorectal Surgery: Observational Feasibility Study

“…To achieve this, further design optimizations are first needed. Telephone consultations may be replaced by a symptom questionnaire and self-registration in a mobile digital app by patients themselves, which promotes self-management and reduces workload for the monitoring nurse [ 28 ].…”

Systemic Analysis of Barriers of High Quality of Care in Telemonitoring: Integrating the Seips Framework and Fault Tree Analysis

“…Refusal to accept telemonitoring and use the equipment frequently (Huygens et al, 2021; Kato et al, 2015; Kruse et al, 2020; Middlemass et al, 2017; Ziade et al, 2022)…”

“…Lack of e-health education and training for healthcare professionals (Choudhary et al, 2021;Kruse et al, 2020) ii. Poor knowledge and skills about telemonitoring (Kato et al, 2015) • Less face-to-face interactions (Ruberti et al, 2021) • Difficulty to determine which patients can work with telemonitoring devices (Huygens et al, 2021) Telemonitoring Physician…”

Personalized, interdisciplinary patient pathway for cross-sector care of multimorbid patients (eliPfad trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

“…This allows for early detection of deterioration and supports proactive care. Telemedical monitoring has been shown to effectively increase both the patients’ and health care professionals’ satisfaction with care [ 32 ] as well as to improve clinical outcomes among frail and chronically ill elderly [ 33 , 34 ]. Patient-centered care is implemented through individualized treatment plans with personal therapy goals.…”