1960
DOI: 10.1016/0006-3002(60)90438-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The uptake of amino acids by isolated segments of rat intestine II. A survey of affinity for uptake from rates of uptake and competition for uptake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
27
0

Year Published

1962
1962
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
12
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with findings obtained with segments from adult rats [14] and Ehrlich ascites cells [17], the rates of accumulation of glutamic acid and aspartic acid by the segments from 2-day-old rats were very low (Table III). The amide of aspartic acid, asparagine, had a rate of accumulation about 10 times greater than that of the free acid.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In agreement with findings obtained with segments from adult rats [14] and Ehrlich ascites cells [17], the rates of accumulation of glutamic acid and aspartic acid by the segments from 2-day-old rats were very low (Table III). The amide of aspartic acid, asparagine, had a rate of accumulation about 10 times greater than that of the free acid.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Replacement of a hydrogen in a methyl group of alanine with the negatively charged hydrophilic carboxylate group to form aspartic acid virtually abolishes amino acid accumulation. Removal of the net negative charge and most of the hydrophilic properties of the side chain of aspartic acid by formation of the amide asparagine results in reappearance of active accumulation, presumably by the neutral amino acid pathway [14]. The slow accumulation of histidine as compared with other neutral amino acids that was noted in this study has also been reported for adult rat intestine [14] and this also seems to be due to structural considerations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations