2005
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.043489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The [URE3] Prion Is Not Conserved Among Saccharomyces Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported by Talarek et al (2005), we found that we could not select [URE3para] para in S. paradoxus strain MA578, even on overproduction of Ure2p para . We tested whether the [URE3para] para , generated in S. cerevisiae carrying the paradoxus URE2 gene in place of that of cerevisiae, could be transmitted to S. paradoxus by cytoduction (cytoplasmic mixing) to strain MA578, and found that none of several [URE3para] variants were transmitted (Table 2 and data not shown).…”
Section: Nomenclaturesupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As reported by Talarek et al (2005), we found that we could not select [URE3para] para in S. paradoxus strain MA578, even on overproduction of Ure2p para . We tested whether the [URE3para] para , generated in S. cerevisiae carrying the paradoxus URE2 gene in place of that of cerevisiae, could be transmitted to S. paradoxus by cytoduction (cytoplasmic mixing) to strain MA578, and found that none of several [URE3para] variants were transmitted (Table 2 and data not shown).…”
Section: Nomenclaturesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Because of the difficulties of Candida genetics, we chose to examine the prion-forming abilities of C. albicans and C. glabrata Ure2p in S. cerevisiae, an approach often used by others as well (Chernoff et al 2000;Kushnirov et al 2000;Santoso et al 2000;Nakayashiki et al 2001). However, while the Ure2p of S. paradoxus forms a prion in S. cerevisiae (Edskes and Wickner 2002;Edskes et al 2009), it was found to not form [URE3] in S. paradoxus itself (Talarek et al 2005), casting doubt on this approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deletion of the URE2 gene is nonlethal, implying that, at least in the lab environment, both enzymatic and regulatory functions are dispensable. It remains uncertain whether the [URE3] prion ever crops up in the wild [66] and the ability of Ure2 protein homologues to switch to the [URE3] prion form is conserved in some yeast species but not others [67,68]. There nevertheless remains the possibility that the additional epigenetic variability provided by the prionswitch provides an advantage in surviving changes in environment.…”
Section: Relationship Between Enzymatic Regulatory and Prion Functiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loss of the nitrogen regulatory function of Ure2 in strains containing the [URE3] prion, while GPx activity is maintained, is probably due to the relative sizes of the ligands involved in these reactions, and not any reflection of the relative importance of the respective activities. The purpose and evolutionary implications of fungal prions are discussed elsewhere [8,9,66,67,68].…”
Section: Relationship Between Enzymatic Regulatory and Prion Functiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homologs of prion protein Ure2 from the closely related Saccharomyces species exhibited no species barrier, although researchers disagreed on whether Saccharomyces paradoxus Ure2 is capable of forming a prion at all (22)(23)(24). Therefore, it remained unclear whether prion species barrier exists in yeast at the levels of sequence divergence that are comparable to those observed in mammals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%