THE biological effects induced by the polycycic hydrocarbons have been extensively studied in many species and attempts have been made to correlate these effects with the metabolism of the hydrocarbon. To this end investigations of a number of them have been made and from existing data summarised by Young (1950) and Boyland (1950) it would appear that several rather broad conclusions can be drawn.1. The non-carcinogenic hydrocarbons as represented by naphthalene, anthracene and phenanthrene are metabolised to a variety of water soluble products which are excreted in the urine. These metabolic end products consist of phenols and the allied dihydroxy-dihydro compounds both free and conjugated.In addition the urine contains a substance which regenerates the parent hydrocarbon on heating the urine with acid and in the case of naphthalene this precursor has been identified as the glucuronide of 1: 2-dihydro-1-naphthol (Boyland and Solomons, 1955). 2. The carcinogenic hydrocarbons as represented by 1: 2-benzanthracene and chrysene (weak carcinogens), and 1: 2: 5: 6-dibenzanthracene, 3: 4-benzpyrene and 9: 10-dimethyl-1: 2-benzanthracene are metabolised to a variety of excretion products which appear mainly in the faeces, but to a certain extent in the urine, as the free phenols and quinones. Further degradation products have been identified for 1: 2:5: 6-dibenzanthracene (Heidelberger and Wiest, 1951;Bhargava, Hadler and Heidelberger, 1955) and in the case of 3: 4-benzpyrene tissue intermediates have been isolated but not identified (Weigert and Mottram, 1943 and1946). These intermediates readily revert to the fully aromatic benzpyrenoid state and by analogy with the non-carcinogenic hydrocarbons a dihydroxy-dihydro structure has been postulated for them.The essential differences therefore between the metabolic end products of the non-carcinogenic and the carcinogenic hydrocarbons would appear to be:(1) The preponderance of free phenols and quinones as major excretion products of the carcinogenic members. This could possibly be explained on the basis of unstable dihydroxy-dihydro intermediates. The theoretical chemist Pullman (1954) has indeed calculated from resonance energy considerations that the diols of the carcinogenic hydrocarbons should be more susceptible to dehydration than the diols of the non-carcinogenic members.(2) The apparent absence of conjugation amongst the carcinogenic members and (3) the formation of an acid-labile hydrocarbon precursor from the noncarcinogenic members.These conclusions, however, are based upon the behaviour of a relatively small cross-section of the polycyclic hydrocarbons and it was with the idea of extending this field that this investigation was started.