2006
DOI: 10.1080/10361140500507286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The US–Australia free trade agreement: The interface between partisan politics and national objectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the experience of other FTAs is sobering. In the lead-up to the AUSFTA, for example, it was predicted that there would be significant gains for the Australian agricultural industry as the USA maintained some of its highest trade barriers for agricultural goods (Krever 2006). The outcomes were far from ideal.…”
Section: Expectations From An Australia-eu Ftamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But the experience of other FTAs is sobering. In the lead-up to the AUSFTA, for example, it was predicted that there would be significant gains for the Australian agricultural industry as the USA maintained some of its highest trade barriers for agricultural goods (Krever 2006). The outcomes were far from ideal.…”
Section: Expectations From An Australia-eu Ftamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes were far from ideal. Though there were seemingly positive changes made with respect to in-quota tariff removals in beef and dairy, safeguards were included by the USA ensuring that tariffs would remain in place in case of declines in the domestic value of those commodities (Clarke & Gao 2007;Krever 2006). Sugar was excluded from the agreement altogether.…”
Section: Expectations From An Australia-eu Ftamentioning
confidence: 99%