The US-led security network in the Indo-Pacific in international order transition: a South Korean perspective

Park, Jae Jeok

doi:10.1080/09512748.2022.2160790

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Book1

Other1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent4

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

European Union (Or Member States) as a Security Provider in the Indo-Pacific: South Korea’s Perception and Security Cooperation Between the Two

Park

2024

The European Union as a Security Actor in the Indo-Pacific

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

European Union (Or Member States) as a Security Provider in the Indo-Pacific: South Korea’s Perception and Security Cooperation Between the Two

Park

2024

The European Union as a Security Actor in the Indo-Pacific

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

After Hedging

He,

Feng

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The strategic rivalry between the United States and China has heightened since COVID-19. Secondary states face increasing difficulties maintaining a 'hedging' strategy between the United States and China. This Element introduces a preference-for-change model to explain the policy variations of states during the order transition. It suggests that policymakers will perceive a potential change in the international order through a cost–benefit prism. The interplays between the perceived costs and the perception of benefits from the order transition will shape states' policy choices among four strategic options: (1) hedging to bet on uncertainties; (2) bandwagoning with rising powers to support changes; (3) balancing against rising powers to resist changes; and (4) buck-passing to ignore changes. Four case studies (Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, and Thailand) are conducted to explore the policy choices of regional powers during the international order transition. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

show abstract

South Korea Releases Indo-Pacific Strategy: Analysis of Shifting Attitudes and Motivations

Qing

2023

SHS Web of Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since Trump’s “Indo-Pacific Strategy” was formally unveiled in 2017, the South Korean government’s perspective has undergone a dramatic shift. From being “very cautious” in the early years of the Moon Jae-in administration to “gradually approaching” in the latter years, to the Korean Indo-Pacific Strategy’s release immediately following Yoon Seok-yeol’s assumption of office to benchmark with the United States, which has raised concerns on all sides, this essay explores the domestic and external factors that have affected South Korea’s perception of the Indo-Pacific Strategy. On the domestic front, the primary drivers are rooted in economic interests and diplomatic considerations, with political party competition exerting a significant influence. On the international level, the continuous change in the situation in Northeast Asia and the pressure from the US have also compelled South Korea to seek more influence through the Indo-Pacific policy.

show abstract

The US-led security network in the Indo-Pacific in international order transition: a South Korean perspective

Cited by 4 publications

References 10 publications

European Union (Or Member States) as a Security Provider in the Indo-Pacific: South Korea’s Perception and Security Cooperation Between the Two

European Union (Or Member States) as a Security Provider in the Indo-Pacific: South Korea’s Perception and Security Cooperation Between the Two

After Hedging

South Korea Releases Indo-Pacific Strategy: Analysis of Shifting Attitudes and Motivations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About