Next Generation Plant Breeding 2018
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.76247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Usage of Genomic Selection Strategy in Plant Breeding

Abstract: Major paradigm shift in plant breeding since the availability of molecular marker technology is that mapping and characterizing the genetic loci that control a trait will lead to improved breeding. Often, one of the rationales for cloning of QTL is to develop the "perfect marker" for MAS, perhaps based on a functional polymorphism. In contrast, an advantage of genomic selection is precisely its black box approach to exploiting genotyping technology to expedite genetic progress. This is an advantage in our view… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Introducing an element of genomic prediction at the cross-selection stage (genomic mating) is much more palatable to established breeding programs than at later stages (genomic selection), such as selecting the best progeny. Indeed, using genomic selection during the actual selection phase entails major changes in resource allocation (from performing field trials to generating and processing genomic data) [11]. In contrast, using genomic prediction methods to identify promising crosses can be introduced into a breeding program with much more limited impact on how it is run.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Introducing an element of genomic prediction at the cross-selection stage (genomic mating) is much more palatable to established breeding programs than at later stages (genomic selection), such as selecting the best progeny. Indeed, using genomic selection during the actual selection phase entails major changes in resource allocation (from performing field trials to generating and processing genomic data) [11]. In contrast, using genomic prediction methods to identify promising crosses can be introduced into a breeding program with much more limited impact on how it is run.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to predict complex quantitative traits solely from genotypic data (molecular markers) is a desirable goal for plant breeding programs [5]. During the last decade, much work has been done to optimize GS models in plants, but practical implementation of GS in breeding programs remains limited [6][7][8][9][10] as the shift from phenotypic to genomic selection entails major changes in resource allocation and logistics [11]. In GS, genome-wide genotypic data are used to estimate trait values for each line derived from crossing a pair of parental lines and to select the most promising lines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minor QTLs and genomic selection Genomic selection is a marker-assisted selection approach to enhance quantitative traits in breeding population, in which whole genome SNPs (single-nucleotide polymorphisms) markers can be used to predict breeding values. Genomic selection has been proved to increase breeding efficiency in both plant and animal breeding, such as dairy cattle, pig, rice and soybean [41]. To get an accurate prediction in genomic selection, we need a better understanding of the population of SNP makers and the contribution of each markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic selection is a marker-assisted selection approach to enhance quantitative traits in breeding population, in which whole genome SNPs (single-nucleotide polymorphisms) markers can be used to predict breeding values. Genomic selection has been proved to increase breeding efficiency in both plant and animal breeding, such as dairy cattle, pig, rice and soybean [41]. To get an accurate prediction in genomic selection, we need a better understanding of the population of SNP makers and the contribution of each markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%