SynopsisThe implementation of electronic prescribing and medication administration systems (EPMAs) is a priority for hospitals and a potential component of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS).
ObjectivesThis study aimed to identify software features within EPMAs that could potentially facilitate AMS and to survey practising UK infection specialist healthcare professionals in order to assign priority to these software features.
MethodsA questionnaire was developed using nominal group technique and transmitted via email links through professional networks. The questionnaire collected demographic data, information on priority areas and anticipated impact of EPMA. Responses from different respondent groups were compared using the Mann Whitney U test.
ResultsResponses were received from 164 individuals (142 analysable). Respondents were predominantly specialist infection pharmacists (48%) or medical microbiologists (37%). 59% of pharmacists had experience of EPMA in their hospitals compared to 35% of microbiologists. Pharmacists assigned higher priority to: indication prompt (p<0.001), allergy checker (p=0.003) treatment protocols (p=0.003), drug-indication mismatch alerts (p=0.031) and prolonged course alerts (p=0.041); and lower priority to a dose checker for adults (p=0.02) and an interaction checker (p<0.05), than microbiologists. A "soft stop" functionality was rated essential or a high priority by 89% of respondents. Potential EPMA software features were expected to have the greatest impact on stewardship, treatment efficacy and patient safety outcomes with lowest impact on Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), antimicrobial resistance and drug expenditure.
ConclusionsThe survey demonstrates key differences in health professionals' opinions of different healthcare benefits of EPMA but a consensus of anticipated positive impact on patient safety and antimicrobial stewardship.