2006
DOI: 10.1197/jamia.m1749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use and Interpretation of Quasi-Experimental Studies in Medical Informatics

Abstract: Quasi-experimental study designs, often described as nonrandomized, pre-post intervention studies, are common in the medical informatics literature. Yet little has been written about the benefits and limitations of the quasi-experimental approach as applied to informatics studies. This paper outlines a relative hierarchy and nomenclature of quasi-experimental study designs that is applicable to medical informatics intervention studies. In addition, the authors performed a systematic review of two medical infor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
479
0
19

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 721 publications
(500 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
479
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, Harris et al stated that quasiexperimental designs are commonly employed in the evaluation of the effectiveness of educational programs when random assignment is not possible or practical. 15 Most of the present study girls (60%) belong to the age group of 19-20 years. This is considered appropriate age as these young girls should be more aware about breast cancer and BSE before they reach the age of common occurrence of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, Harris et al stated that quasiexperimental designs are commonly employed in the evaluation of the effectiveness of educational programs when random assignment is not possible or practical. 15 Most of the present study girls (60%) belong to the age group of 19-20 years. This is considered appropriate age as these young girls should be more aware about breast cancer and BSE before they reach the age of common occurrence of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some of the interventions were unable to demonstrate significant improvement in targeted outcomes. Because quasi-experimental designs do not adequately control for extraneous variables and alternate explanations of the treatment effect (Harris et al, 2006), resultant effect sizes might be overestimated (Shadish & Baldwin, 2003). Therefore, an analysis of treatment effect will examine results for RCTs and QEDs separately.…”
Section: Analysis Of Treatment Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quasi-RCT was determined to be any observational study that performed a matched cohort analysis using propensity scores (18). We decided a priori to repeat the sensitivity analysis using studies evaluating venovenous exctracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) only, studies in which lung-protective ventilation was adopted in the ECLS and control arms, and studies using different matching strategies to determine the control cohort.…”
Section: Sensitivity and Subgroup Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%