2003
DOI: 10.1108/07378830310467418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use and usability of SFX: context‐sensitive reference linking

Abstract: SFX is an XML based product designed to inter-link electronic resources with other resources in context-sensitive manner. SFX was first developed at the University of Ghent by Herbert Von de Sompel and has been released as a commercial product by Ex Libris. Use statistics garnered from SFX's statistics module since the implementation July of 2001 are discussed in the context of an academic research library environment. The results from usability testing conducted at Washington State University are reported. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to usability studies of SFX done at WSU, 8 the linker was difficult to find or use in the databases most heavily used by the disciplines covered in this study. Shortly a er these data were collected, the tool was renamed Find It (instead of using the default name SFX) in the hope that this would indicate to patrons what the bu on or link would do.…”
Section: How Did Early Implementation Of a Link-resolving Tool Affectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to usability studies of SFX done at WSU, 8 the linker was difficult to find or use in the databases most heavily used by the disciplines covered in this study. Shortly a er these data were collected, the tool was renamed Find It (instead of using the default name SFX) in the hope that this would indicate to patrons what the bu on or link would do.…”
Section: How Did Early Implementation Of a Link-resolving Tool Affectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, as librarians became aware of usability research methods, they applied these techniques to test patron access to electronic resources. To note but a few examples from this ample literature: Cockrell and Jayne (2002) asked students to find eresources using library systems; Cummings and Johnson (2003) observed students using OpenURL linking; Wrubel (2007) offered a concise overview of e-resource usability testing; O'Neill (2009) considered how best to instruct patrons in OpenURL linking based on usability results; next generation catalogues (Majors, 2012) and discovery services (Asher, Duke, & Wilson, 2013;Fagan, Mandernach, Nelson, Paulo, & Saunders, 2012;Williams & Foster, 2011) have been studied thoroughly; Kress, Del Bosque and Ipri (2011) conducted a study to find out why students placed unnecessary ILL requests; and Imler and Eichelberger (2014) investigated how confusing vocabulary acts as a barrier to full-text. Considered as a whole, this usability research demonstrates librarians' awareness that the problems leading to full-text nonavailability are complex, arising from both library systems and human error.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once a set of search results has been returned, the user is taken to the most “appropriate” copy of the full resource by means of extended linking services that create links dynamically rather than relying on hard‐coded URLs. This context‐sensitive linking is enabled by use of the new OpenURL standard (Breeding, 2003; Collins and Ferguson, 2002; Evans, 2001; Sun Microsystems, 2003; Walker, 2001b), and products such as SFX, LinkFinderPlus and Vlink can operate independently of the ILMS software used (Cummings and Johnson, 2003; Grogg and Ferguson, 2003; Kochtanek, 2001; Vogt, 2003).…”
Section: Trends In Integrated Library Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%