1972
DOI: 10.1148/105.2.455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of a Foley Catheter for Removal of Blunt Esophageal Foreign Bodies from Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed this study to identify the role of radiology in the diagnosis, treatment, [4,5], and pediatric radiologists became involved in the treatment as well as the diagnosis of esophageal foreign bodies [6,7]. Although this technique offers a fast, effective, and inexpensive alternative to esophagoscopy, some controvemsy exists about its safety [8].…”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed this study to identify the role of radiology in the diagnosis, treatment, [4,5], and pediatric radiologists became involved in the treatment as well as the diagnosis of esophageal foreign bodies [6,7]. Although this technique offers a fast, effective, and inexpensive alternative to esophagoscopy, some controvemsy exists about its safety [8].…”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous authors report a success rate of up to 95% using the balloon extraction technique [2,3]. In our series we have succeeded in only 67% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…Using this method several investigators have reported a success rate of up to 95% [2,3]. We wish to report a patient group in which catheter extraction of esophageal foreign bodies was less successful, and a radiographic sign which appears to be predictive of an unsuccessful foreign body removal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Since then, multiple case series have been reported. 1,6,8,[11][12][13][14] However, this technique is still not widely used. Concerns that have been raised include the inability to inspect the esophageal mucosa after removal, the possibility of missing other ingested objects that are not radio-opaque, lack of airway protection during the procedure, radiation exposure, and discomfort of the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%