“…21 The AHRQ funded a systematic review of the impact of HIT on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care that was published in 2006. 22 The review showed that HIT improved the • Quick access to large amount of information, especially historical information (54) • Quick and easy to use (44) • Documentation and ordering process customizable (39) • Readily accessible from anywhere, can be accessed by multiple users at a time, and can be accessed by all disciplines (34) • Legibility and clarity of documentation (28) • Standardizes ordering process for PN and other orders with order sets (28) • Easy to review current medications (9) • Automatic calculation of medication dosages, BMI, etc. (8) • Dietitians can enter orders (7) • Orders are transmitted and carried out quicker (4) • Better care and less chance for medical errors (4) • Care plans are easier (2) "Least Like" Responses (284) • Time-consuming and cumbersome to use (66) • PN orders, compounding, and/or administration difficult and can result in errors (41) • Limited or deficient in nutrition or nutrition support content (40) • Oral diet orders incomplete and/or confusing (26) • Difficult for physicians and other staff to access and read dietitian documentation and notes (22) • EN orders incomplete and/or confusing (19) • Enhancement requests take a long time to implement if ever get incorporated (13) • Some orders are difficult to find or confusing (10) • Too much information in too many different places (8) • Nursing documentation is incomplete or deficient (7) • Comments in diet orders do not interface with nutrition software (5) quality of patient care through increased adherence to guideline-or protocol-based care, improved clinical monitoring based on large-scale screening and aggregation of data, and, most important, reduced medication errors.…”