2006
DOI: 10.1002/jip.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of a linkage analysis as evidence in the conviction of the Newcastle serial murderer, South Africa

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bennell & Canter, 2002;Grubin et al, 2001;Labuschagne, 2006). This interest is unsurprising given the potential investigative benefits of successfully linking crimes.…”
Section: Behavioral Case Linkagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bennell & Canter, 2002;Grubin et al, 2001;Labuschagne, 2006). This interest is unsurprising given the potential investigative benefits of successfully linking crimes.…”
Section: Behavioral Case Linkagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary use of this form of behavioural analysis is to inform investigative decision making, however, some recent publications have reported the use of behavioural similarity in offending behaviour in legal proceedings in the United Kingdom, the United States, and South Africa (Hazelwood & Warren, 2003;Labuschagne, 2006;Meyer, 2007;Woodhams & Toye, 2007). Whilst the presentation of expert evidence of behavioural similarity is relatively rare, there are now several examples of its use in legal proceedings, one of which dates back 50 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…More recently, evidence of behavioural similarity has also been admitted in the case of the State of California v. Prince (2007( , as cited in Turvey, 2008) which relates to a series of murders. Labuschagne (2006) reported on the use of linkage analysis evidence in the case of the Newcastle serial murderer in South Africa (South Africa has an adversarial system where the State and Defence can both present a case and cross-examine witnesses, however, there is not a jury.). This evidence was presented to assist the presiding offi cer of the court to decide whether the same individual was responsible for the series of murders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Crime linkage is currently used to inform police investigations of a range of crime types, in cases of sexual assault and murder (see the Serious Crime Analysis Section; National Crime Agency, n.d.) and in a wider variety of crime types according to police service priority, notably burglary, robbery, and car crime (Burrell & Bull, ). In some countries, it is also used to support prosecutions in court (Labuschagne, , ; Pakkanen, Santtila, & Bosco, ). Using offender behaviour to link crimes can be advantageous where more traditional linkage methods are expensive and time‐consuming (Pakkanen, Zappalà, Grönroos, & Santtila, ), or where there is limited or no physical forensic evidence (Grubin, Kelly, & Brunsdon, ; Labuschagne, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When used as an investigative tool, the potential ramifications of inefficient or erroneous crime linkage could be severe. This consideration is especially important given that crime linkage is used in this capacity across many different policing contexts and across different continents, including countries in Europe (Rainbow, ), North America (Hazelwood & Warren, ), and Africa (Labuschagne, ). Inaccurate linkage predictions may hinder, rather than help, an investigation, including the inappropriate allocation of law enforcement resources and, in the case of incorrectly identifying several cases as linked, generating unwarranted media interest and unnecessary public anxiety (Grubin et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%