1941
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0200332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of All-Night Lights for Growing Turkeys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from the present study support the observations of Milby and Thompson (1941) that no significant differences occurred in growth or feed consumption of torn poults grown from 0 to 8 weeks of age in continuous artificial light and natural daylight, even though day lengths increased in their study and decreased in our study. In addition, the other light treatments utilized in this study had no consistent significant effect on body weight or feed intake to 8 weeks of age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results from the present study support the observations of Milby and Thompson (1941) that no significant differences occurred in growth or feed consumption of torn poults grown from 0 to 8 weeks of age in continuous artificial light and natural daylight, even though day lengths increased in their study and decreased in our study. In addition, the other light treatments utilized in this study had no consistent significant effect on body weight or feed intake to 8 weeks of age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Turkey producers in the southeastern United States often allow turkey flocks exposure to natural day light within confined areas during the grow-out phases. Because poultry tend to consume more feed and water and are more active during light than dark (Milby and Thompson, 1941;Beane et al, 1965;Foshee et al, 1970;Buckland et al, 1974;Buckland, 1975;Squibb and Collier, 1979), it would seem that the longer the light period, the greater the opportunity to eat. Because rate of growth is dependent on feed intake, long day lengths with constant light intensities were expected to result in greater growth rates than shorter day lengths or natural day lengths with variable light intensities (Deaton et al, 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Milby and Thompson (1941) reported, on the basis of four trials conducted over four years, that providing night light to supplement natural daylight so the birds were grown under continuous light rather than on natural light and dark periods did not result in any improvements in body weight. The birds used were relatively slow growing by today's standards, with the average weight of the males ranging from 3.18 to 5-18 kg at 20 weeks of age.…”
Section: Broiler and Heavy Turkeysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Milby and Thompson (1941) reported that allnight lights did not influence the growth of spring-hatched male or female turkeys to 27 weeks of age. In two separate experiments, McCartney (1956) compared the effects of naturally increasing (from 12 to 15 h per day) and naturally decreasing (from 12 to 9 h per day) light with those of a constant photoperiod of 13 h per day (13L:11D) on the growth of hens to 24 and 28 weeks of age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%