2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05440-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of allograft tendons in primary ACL reconstruction

Abstract: Purpose Graft choice in primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains controversial. The use of allograft has risen exponentially in recent years with the attraction of absent donor site morbidity, reduced surgical time and reliable graft size. However, the published evidence examining their clinical effectiveness over autograft tendons has been unclear. The aim of this paper is to provide a current review of the clinical evidence available to help guide surgeons through the decision-making p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
70
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
(178 reference statements)
2
70
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The graft undergoes long-term storage in liquid nitrogen at –196° C. It is worth noting that the cryoprotective solutions are associated with a diminished intravascular immune response by the host and heightened angiogenesis. 32 Of additional importance is the distinction that cryopreservation may allow for cell viability, while fresh-frozen and freeze-dried grafts do not. 58 Suhodolčan et al 58 compared the biomechanical properties of cryopreserved BTB allografts using glycerol as a cryoprotective agent with fresh-frozen allografts.…”
Section: Allograft Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The graft undergoes long-term storage in liquid nitrogen at –196° C. It is worth noting that the cryoprotective solutions are associated with a diminished intravascular immune response by the host and heightened angiogenesis. 32 Of additional importance is the distinction that cryopreservation may allow for cell viability, while fresh-frozen and freeze-dried grafts do not. 58 Suhodolčan et al 58 compared the biomechanical properties of cryopreserved BTB allografts using glycerol as a cryoprotective agent with fresh-frozen allografts.…”
Section: Allograft Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there were no reports that suggest that allograft may have a better longterm outcome than autograft. Allografts have inherent disadvantages, including a longer and less complete course of incorporation, remodeling, biomechanical inferiority to autograft, and the potential risk of immunogenic reaction and disease transmission [13,14]. Allograft remodeling is delayed in ACL reconstruction and results in reduced long-term stability and mechanical function compared with autograft ACL reconstruction [13,14].…”
Section: Hee-soo Kyungmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allografts have inherent disadvantages, including a longer and less complete course of incorporation, remodeling, biomechanical inferiority to autograft, and the potential risk of immunogenic reaction and disease transmission [13,14]. Allograft remodeling is delayed in ACL reconstruction and results in reduced long-term stability and mechanical function compared with autograft ACL reconstruction [13,14]. Higher longterm failure rates and poorer graft maturation score for allograft were reported compared with those for autograft [15,16].…”
Section: Hee-soo Kyungmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So erfolgten in den USA. beispielsweise bereits im Jahr 2013 etwa 40 % der primären vorderen Kreuzbandrekonstruktionen und 80 % der Bandrevisionen mittels Allografts [1].…”
Section: Allograftsunclassified