1955
DOI: 10.1037/h0042418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of an electronic computer in principal axes factor analysis.

Abstract: A procedure is described for the execution of a principal axes analysis on a computer. Reasons for preferring a principal axes to a centroid solution in the initial factoring of the matrix are given. The University of Illinois electronic computer (Iliac) is then described, followed by an explanation of the sine-cosine method adopted for calculating the factor loadings, and the daily computational procedures for factorizing a correlation matrix once the appropriate set of machine orders is prepared.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective was to examine if the administration of the Brazilian version of COHIP-SF [2] at different times (seven days apart) indicated statistically similar factor structures. For that purpose, the congruence coefficient [20] was adopted, in which the factorial load of each variable was used, that is, each question of the Brazilian version of COHIP-SF 19. Tools containing 20 questions, with a 5% significance, should have a congruence coefficient greater than 0.48 [21].…”
Section: Comparison Of Cohip-sf 19 Factor Structures Administered At mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The objective was to examine if the administration of the Brazilian version of COHIP-SF [2] at different times (seven days apart) indicated statistically similar factor structures. For that purpose, the congruence coefficient [20] was adopted, in which the factorial load of each variable was used, that is, each question of the Brazilian version of COHIP-SF 19. Tools containing 20 questions, with a 5% significance, should have a congruence coefficient greater than 0.48 [21].…”
Section: Comparison Of Cohip-sf 19 Factor Structures Administered At mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim was to examine if these instruments were measuring the same phenomenon. For that purpose, the congruence coefficient was used [20]. Likewise, the value of the proposed congruence coefficient should be greater than 0.48 [21].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Factor Structures Of The Proposed Version mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To separate our bulk data, comprising 64 µs of simulations in total, into states representing Gs GDP conformations with different structural properties, we combined the two datasets of Gs GDP and β 2 AR-Gs GDP simulations and analyzed them in terms of the principal components 43,44 GDP upon association with the receptor provides potential clues to pathways by which the signal is transmitted from the receptor to the nucleotide binding pocket. Our contact analysis suggests two pathways centered on α5.…”
Section: Extended Data Fig 2 Table S 4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Means, standard deviations, and/or variances and covariances can be obtained in the same operation if required. The second stage is the calculation of principal axes factor loadings (6,19). The third is the rotation of these loadings by the quartimax or some other analytic method.…”
Section: Operation Of An Electronic Computermentioning
confidence: 99%