2008
DOI: 10.1002/met.80
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of an improved atmospheric correction algorithm for removing atmospheric effects from remotely sensed images using an atmosphere–surface simulation and meteorological data

Abstract: Unless effective corrections can be applied, satellite remote sensing data will remain modified by the absorption and scattering effects of the atmosphere through which the electromagnetic radiation must pass, between the Sun, the ground and the sensor. The true reflectance of the land will not be recoverable, and multi-temporal datasets will not be comparable as a result of the variability of the atmosphere. This article presents a method of removing atmospheric effects from satellite remote sensing images fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The separation of contributions is not known a priori, so the objective of atmospheric correction is to quantify these two components so that the main analysis can made on the correct target reflectance or radiance values. The darkest pixel (DP) atmospheric correction method, also termed histogram minimum method (Hadjimitsis 1999(Hadjimitsis , 2008Hadjimitsis et al 2000bHadjimitsis et al , 2003Hadjimitsis et al , 2004Hadjimitsis et al , 2006Hadjimitsis and Clayton 2008), was applied to the eight satellite images of the Lower Thames Valley reservoirs. The DP method was found to produce reservoir reflectance values within the range of ground measurements acquired in the reservoirs using a field GER1500 field spectro-radiometer Hadjimitsis et al (2004).…”
Section: Fig 3 Overall Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The separation of contributions is not known a priori, so the objective of atmospheric correction is to quantify these two components so that the main analysis can made on the correct target reflectance or radiance values. The darkest pixel (DP) atmospheric correction method, also termed histogram minimum method (Hadjimitsis 1999(Hadjimitsis , 2008Hadjimitsis et al 2000bHadjimitsis et al , 2003Hadjimitsis et al , 2004Hadjimitsis et al , 2006Hadjimitsis and Clayton 2008), was applied to the eight satellite images of the Lower Thames Valley reservoirs. The DP method was found to produce reservoir reflectance values within the range of ground measurements acquired in the reservoirs using a field GER1500 field spectro-radiometer Hadjimitsis et al (2004).…”
Section: Fig 3 Overall Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical remote sensing data are affected by the atmosphere. These effects can be removed using suitable atmospheric corrections and bi-directional reflectance models (Zhang et al 2003;Hadjimitsis and Clayton 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it was found (Table 2), the relative humidity during the satellite overpass was similar (≈57-67%) for all days except 19/03/2010 (33%) and 15/06/2010 (77%). Relative humidity and temperature as shown by Forster [34] and by Hadjimitsis and Clayton [30] can be used to provide a measure of the equivalent mass of liquid water or water vapour thickness. Although DP algorithm can be applied without any auxiliary meteorological data, as a fully image-based technique, the authors used these data to investigate any possible water vapour absorption effect in atmospheric correction.…”
Section: Meteorological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than water bodies, atmospheric effects, account for the majority of the at-satellite measured radiance in the visible bands [29], and therefore such targets provide an opportunity to assess the effectiveness of the varying atmospheric correction methods [30,31]. This has been shown by Hadjimitsis et al [25], who provided a critical assessment of the effectiveness of most of the available algorithms using Landsat TM satellite imagery and in situ spectroradiometric measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the atmosphere transformation processes such as NO X to nitrates (Wang et al 2006) and SO 2 to sulfates (Quan et al 2008) at urban and industrial areas may also cause SPM. The study of particulate matter (PM) is important because of its effects on human health (Adamson et al 1999;Williams et al 2003;WHO 2005), atmospheric visibility (Seinfeld and Pandis 1998), climate change (Haywood and Boucher 2000), satellite imagery (Hadjimitsis et al 2004;Hadjimitsis and Clayton 2008), as well as the nutrient balance and acidity of soil (Yun et al 2002;Odabasi and Bagiroz 2002). The PM with sizes of less than 10 and 2.5 M 10 and PM 2.5 , respectively (Krewski et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%