2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10709-021-00118-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of an integrative approach to improve accuracy of species identification and detection of new species in studies of stream fish diversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to what was observed in 1088 fish species [ 80 ], sequences with a divergence of greater than 2% or 3% likely belong to different species (with a probability greater than 95%). This COI divergence threshold was generally confirmed with an analysis implementing several methods for species delimitations in fishes and allowed for the identification of cryptic species [ 81 , 82 , 83 ] even in Leuciscidae [ 84 ]; furthermore, 2–3% divergence was observed between many Leucos and Rutilus taxa whose status as good species is not debated. Although our nuclear dataset is limited, a substantial divergence (almost 4%) and a slight difference in length were observed between Cyfun P sequences exclusive to VAR sites and mostly present in specimens belonging to mitochondrial lineage C, and those widespread across S. rubilio populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…According to what was observed in 1088 fish species [ 80 ], sequences with a divergence of greater than 2% or 3% likely belong to different species (with a probability greater than 95%). This COI divergence threshold was generally confirmed with an analysis implementing several methods for species delimitations in fishes and allowed for the identification of cryptic species [ 81 , 82 , 83 ] even in Leuciscidae [ 84 ]; furthermore, 2–3% divergence was observed between many Leucos and Rutilus taxa whose status as good species is not debated. Although our nuclear dataset is limited, a substantial divergence (almost 4%) and a slight difference in length were observed between Cyfun P sequences exclusive to VAR sites and mostly present in specimens belonging to mitochondrial lineage C, and those widespread across S. rubilio populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The current research on fish species identification is mainly aimed at the static images of fish in marine and aquatic fields (Pepe et al, 2007;Bingpeng et al, 2018;Chai et al, 2021;Pereira et al, 2021). Although some achievements have been made, however, the actual situation is that the fish swimming through fishway is a dynamic process, and the body of fish is often in a torsional state of deformation, making it difficult to directly carry out research on the identification of passing fish targets in real fishways engineering scenarios using existing algorithms.…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphology-based identifications make use of different sets of quantitative and qualitative phenotypic characters, which include allometry, phylogenetics, morphometrics, and meristics (Hebert et al, 2003; Ward et al, 2009). For certain taxonomic groups, convergence in morphologically diagnostic characters and cryptic species pose a challenge for morphological-based identification (Pires & Marinoni, 2010; Marancik et al, 2020; Pereira et al, 2021). In addition, the ‘taxonomic impediment’: the small number of trained taxonomists and funding compared to the need for these specialists, complicates these issues further creating an intrinsic problem with incomplete/outdated references (Pires & Marinoni, 2010; Sheth & Thaker, 2017; Riccardi et al, 2020; Engel et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrative taxonomic approaches that combine complementary datasets such as DNA and morphology, have proven to be efficient in addressing gaps left by each individual method (Breedy et al, 2012; Riedel et al, 2013; von Beeren et al, 2016; Duong et al, 2020; Zamani et al, 2022). The term ‘integrative taxonomy’ can be used to describe two processes, species delimitation/discovery and specimen identification (Pires & Marinoni, 2010; Pereira et al, 2021); herein we use the term integrative taxonomy to refer to specimen identification. The use of multiple data sources to support a specimen identity and subsequently the species presence in an area provides strong evidence that can be used for implementation of conservation plans, a key component to secure financial support for conservation (Sheth & Thaker, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%