“…Most previous studies have focused on hATG and rATG; however, studies comparing pALG and rATG, which are widely used in China, are lacking. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacies, survival, and safety profiles in patients that were treated with pALG and rATG, and found that the 1-yr overall response rate was 83.78% in the pALG group and the median time to first response was 94 (17-265) d, which are in agreement with the findings of Bing et al (16) and Zhang et al (19). The 5-yr overall survival rate of the patients was 82.22% and the event-free survival rate was 71.11% in the pALG group in the present study, while for the rATG group, our results showed that the 1-yr overall response rate was 66.67%, the median time to first response was 146 (31-334) d, and the 5-yr overall survival rate and event-free survival rate were both 68.75%, which were in accordance with the findings of the EBMT (20), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (21), the Cleveland Clinic study (22), and Zheng et al (2006) (23).…”