2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of assessment rubrics to enhance feedback in higher education: An integrative literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
45
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, students were unhappy with the lack of timeliness, consistency and poor quality of the feedback they received across all the years. This has been documented by other studies both nationally and internationally (Cockett and Jackson, 2018). With regards to timeliness, students felt the turnover time was too long for written assignments.…”
Section: Timeliness and Consistency Of Assessment And Feedbacksupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, students were unhappy with the lack of timeliness, consistency and poor quality of the feedback they received across all the years. This has been documented by other studies both nationally and internationally (Cockett and Jackson, 2018). With regards to timeliness, students felt the turnover time was too long for written assignments.…”
Section: Timeliness and Consistency Of Assessment And Feedbacksupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Assessment rubrics have been implemented by universities as a way of standardising feedback and providing consistency thereby improving the quality of feedback (Reddy and Andrade 2010;Cockett and Jackson 2018). Despite criticism in the literature about the usefulness of rubrics from a staff perspective (Reddy and Andrade 2010), students were in favour of using rubrics as a good learning tool (Tractenberg and Fitzgerald 2012;Cockett and Jackson 2018).…”
Section: Timeliness and Consistency Of Assessment And Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In her article 'Analytical rubrics in higher education: A repository of empirical data ' Hack (2015) suggests that there is a need for 'greater transparency and clarity in the assessment process, for students and markers', and comments on the improved consistency in marking when rubrics are used, but notes that evidence is not so clear on whether the use of rubrics is effective in assessing specified learning outcomes. Cockett and Jackson (2018), in their article on the use of assessment rubrics provide a comprehensive literature review, and make several observations: that rubrics can be useful in standardising feedback and ensuring consistency across markers and student submissions; that rubrics may enhance students' higher-order thinking skills, but more interestingly appear to improve learner satisfaction; that rubrics should not be seen as a panacea for all student concerns relating to feedback ('quality, usefulness and consistency'); and finally that rubrics are most effective when they have been co-created with students themselves (students as partners). Falchikov and Boud (1989) discuss self-assessment and describe how more experienced learners, and learners who have expertise in a subject, tend to be more accurate in self-assessment process and lead to greater student-teacher agreement in terms of outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of rubrics helps students during the learning process because it provides them with feedback, allowing them to gradually improve their marks. The rubrics can enhance both student performance but perhaps more importantly students' perceptions and use of feedback [9], therefore, it benefits professors throughout the teaching-learning process [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%