2000
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/33/3/303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of basis splines and non-orthogonal orbitals inR-matrix calculations: application to Li photoionization

Abstract: We present a new extended version of the R-matrix method for the calculation of continuum properties in which non-orthogonal orbitals are extensively used for describing both the target states and the R-matrix basis functions. In particular, a B-spline basis is used for the description of continuum states in the inner region and the target states may be obtained from independent calculations. This leads to a generalized eigenvalue problem but has the advantage of requiring much smaller bases for accurate repre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
52
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
8
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computer memory limitations often lead to the use of inconsistent sets of N-electron and (N + 1)-electron configurations. We note the existence of methods that may allow this problem to be avoided or its effects drastically reduced, in particular the method developed by Gorczyca et al (1995) and the B-spline R-matrix approach with non-orthogonal orbitals (e.g., Zatsarinny & Froese Fischer 2000;Zatsarinny & Tayal 2001), a code for which was recently published by Zatsarinny (2006). With this in mind, we chose consistent N-and (N + 1)-electron configurations for our calculations.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer memory limitations often lead to the use of inconsistent sets of N-electron and (N + 1)-electron configurations. We note the existence of methods that may allow this problem to be avoided or its effects drastically reduced, in particular the method developed by Gorczyca et al (1995) and the B-spline R-matrix approach with non-orthogonal orbitals (e.g., Zatsarinny & Froese Fischer 2000;Zatsarinny & Tayal 2001), a code for which was recently published by Zatsarinny (2006). With this in mind, we chose consistent N-and (N + 1)-electron configurations for our calculations.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonorthogonal orbitals provide much greater flexibility in the choice of wave functions than the orthogonal orbitals, and also allow the inclusion of correlation with a reasonable number of configurations and correlated orbitals ( Zatsarinny & Tayal 2001). Our calculations are performed using the multiconfiguration Hartree-Fock ( MCHF) method (Froese Fischer 1991;Zatsarinny & Froese Fischer 1999, 2000. In the MCHF approach the atomic state is represented by an atomic state function…”
Section: Target Levels Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The B-spline R-matrix approach (Zatsarinny & Froese Fischer 2000;Zatsarinny & Tayal 2001a) has been employed in collision calculations. In this method the nonorthogonal orbitals are used for the description of both the bound target state wave functions and the continuum scattering wave functions.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%