The Use of Cancellous Bone-Block Allograft for Reconstruction of the Atrophic Alveolar Ridge

Chaushu, Gavriel; Nissan, Joseph

doi:10.5772/38375

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 52 publications

(55 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At the end of the 4 months follow-up period, the postoperative CBCT scans for both Group I and showed newly formed bone and increase in alveolar bone dimensions in most cases except 2 cases from the control group where we had the mesh exposure. The augmented alveolar ridges showed good maturation of bone graft on the follow up CBCT scans, with evidence of normal bony architecture Figure (16).…”

Section: Radiographic Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Chaushu reported that infection of the bone grafted site occurred in 18 (13%) of 137 bone blocks. In 7 (39%) of the 18 infected blocks, total graft failure was established, and in 4 (22%) of the 18 partial graft failure was established [15,16] . Chaushu et al declared that there is no no significant relationship between the potential risk factors for complications and patient age or sex.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Precisely, combined membrane uncoverage with incision line opening resulted in infection in 44% of cases and into total graft failure in 17%. He reported that the usage of the cancellous block graft was not only the cause of graft failure but also technical issues [16] .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Evaluation of custom made xenogenic bone grafts in mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation versus particulate bone graft with titanium mesh

Abuelnaga¹,

Elbokle²,

Khashaba³

2018

OMX

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: This study was to evaluate clinically and radiographically the volume changes of alveolar ridge grafting using customized xenogenic bone graft. Materials and Methods: A total of 12 patients with mandibular horizontal and vertical alveolar ridge defects ≥ 3 mm were selected. They were divided into 2 groups: Group I (Test Group) included 6 patients in which mandibular alveolar ridges were reconstructed with customized Xenogenic bone graft Smartbone (IBI S.A., Switzerland). Group II (Control Group) included 6 patients in which mandibular alveolar ridges were reconstructed with particulate Xenogenic bone (Smart bone, IBI S.A., Switzerland) grafting to posterior mandibular ridge with titanium mesh was performed. Volume analysis of the changes in alveolar ridge in both Groups were obtained before and four months after the procedure using CBCT. Densitometric analysis of the Postoperative bone formed and compared with native bone. . Results: Four months postoperatively. Measurements made on cone-beam computerized tomograms, four months postoperative showed significance increase in bone volume by 40 % in the area of newly formed bone in Group I (Customized bone) compared with 23% in Control Group. Statistical significant changes was found in the density of newly formed bone four months post-operatively in both Groups, however there was no significant difference in bone density postoperatively between Group I (customized Bone) and Group II (Control). Conclusion:According to the results, the treatment of defective alveolar ridge augmentation of the mandibular ridge with customized xenogenic bone graft Smartbone (IBI S.A., Switzerland) is successful and produces results consistent with the control Group.

show abstract

Section: Radiographic Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of custom made xenogenic bone grafts in mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation versus particulate bone graft with titanium mesh

Abuelnaga¹,

Elbokle²,

Khashaba³

2018

OMX

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Custom made Xenogenic Bone grafts in Mandibular Alveolar Ridge Augmentation versus Particulate bone graft with titanium mesh

El-Naga

Elbokle

Khashaba

2018

OMX

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: This study was to evaluate clinically and radiographically the volume changes of alveolar ridge grafting using customized xenogenic bone graft. Materials and Methods: A total of 12 patients with mandibular horizontal and vertical alveolar ridge defects ≥ 3 mm were selected. They were divided into 2 groups: Group I (Test Group) included 6 patients in which mandibular alveolar ridges were reconstructed with customized Xenogenic bone graft Smartbone (IBI S.A., Switzerland). Group II (Control Group) included 6 patients in which mandibular alveolar ridges were reconstructed with particulate Xenogenic bone (Smart bone, IBI S.A., Switzerland) grafting to posterior mandibular ridge with titanium mesh was performed. Volume analysis of the changes in alveolar ridge in both Groups were obtained before and four months after the procedure using CBCT. Densitometric analysis of the Postoperative bone formed and compared with native bone.. Results: Four months postoperatively. Measurements made on cone-beam computerized tomograms, four months postoperative showed significance increase in bone volume by 40 % in the area of newly formed bone in Group I (Customized bone) compared with 23% in Control Group. Statistical significant changes was found in the density of newly formed bone four months post-operatively in both Groups, however there was no significant difference in bone density postoperatively between Group I (customized Bone) and Group II (Control). Conclusion: According to the results, the treatment of defective alveolar ridge augmentation of the mandibular ridge with customized xenogenic bone graft Smartbone (IBI S.A., Switzerland) is successful and produces results consistent with the control Group.

show abstract

The Use of Cancellous Bone-Block Allograft for Reconstruction of the Atrophic Alveolar Ridge

Cited by 2 publications

References 52 publications

Evaluation of custom made xenogenic bone grafts in mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation versus particulate bone graft with titanium mesh

Evaluation of custom made xenogenic bone grafts in mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation versus particulate bone graft with titanium mesh

Evaluation of Custom made Xenogenic Bone grafts in Mandibular Alveolar Ridge Augmentation versus Particulate bone graft with titanium mesh

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About