The Use of Chromatic Information for Motion Segmentation: Differences between Psychophysical and Eye-Movement Measures

Abstract

Previous psychophysical studies have shown that chromatic (red/green) information can be used as a segmentation cue for motion integration. We investigated the mechanisms mediating this phenomenon by comparing chromatic effects (and, for comparison, luminance effects) on motion integration between two measures: (i) directional eye movements with the notion that these responses are mediated mainly by low-level motion mechanisms, and (ii) psychophysical reports, with the notion that subjects' reports should employ higher-level (attention-based) mechanisms if available. To quantify chromatic (and luminance) effects on motion integration, coherent motion thresholds were obtained for two conditions, one in which the signal and noise dots were the same 'red' or 'green' chromaticity (or the same 'bright' or 'dark' luminance), referred to as homogeneous, and the other in which the signal and noise dots were of different chromaticities (or luminances), referred to as heterogeneous. 'Benefit ratios' (theta(HOM)/theta(HET)) were then computed, with values significantly greater than 1.0 indicating that chromatic (or luminance) information serves as a segmentation cue for motion integration. The results revealed a high and significant chromatic benefit ratio when the measure was based on psychophysical report, but not when it was based on an eye-movement measure. By contrast, luminance benefit ratios were roughly the same (and significant) for both measures. For comparison to adults, eye-movement data were also obtained from 3-month-old infants. Infants showed marginally significant benefit ratios in the luminance, but not in the chromatic, condition. In total, these results suggest that the use of chromatic information as a segmentation cue for motion integration relies on higher-level mechanisms, whereas luminance information works mainly through low-level motion mechanisms.

Do older individuals have difficulty processing motion or excluding noise? Implications for safe driving

“…One way to increase or decrease the influence of noise dots on coherence thresholds is to uniquely define the signal and noise dots in the RDK on contrast or color, in addition to the direction of motion (Croner & Albright, 1997;Dobkins & Sampath, 2008;Edwards, Badcock, & Nishida, 1996;Snowden & Edmunds, 1999). In younger groups, coherence thresholds are reduced when signal dots are all presented at a higher contrast than noise dots and increased when noise dots are presented at a higher contrast than signal dots (Conlon, Lilleskaret, Wright, & Power, 2012;Croner & Albright, 1997).…”