1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0160-4120(96)00233-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of cigarette equivalents to assess environmental tobacco smoke exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of this personal monitoring study, where concentrations cannot be directly related to a speci®c environment, the term exposure is used as a measure of``potential inhaled quantity'' and was calculated as the product of the analyte concentration, the time subjected to such concentration and the breathing rate maintained throughout the period. A similar assumption was recently made by Ogden and Martin (1997), who noted that this provided``a more accurate accounting of total exposure among individuals as they engage in dierent activities in dierent microenvironments''. Where exposures have been quoted in terms of CE, these have been calculated in relation to the mainstream particle (tar) and nicotine yields of typical German cigarettes, although it is recognised that the particle phases of ETS and mainstream smoke dier considerably in composition and particle size.…”
Section: Exposures To Rsp Ets Particles and Nicotinesupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the context of this personal monitoring study, where concentrations cannot be directly related to a speci®c environment, the term exposure is used as a measure of``potential inhaled quantity'' and was calculated as the product of the analyte concentration, the time subjected to such concentration and the breathing rate maintained throughout the period. A similar assumption was recently made by Ogden and Martin (1997), who noted that this provided``a more accurate accounting of total exposure among individuals as they engage in dierent activities in dierent microenvironments''. Where exposures have been quoted in terms of CE, these have been calculated in relation to the mainstream particle (tar) and nicotine yields of typical German cigarettes, although it is recognised that the particle phases of ETS and mainstream smoke dier considerably in composition and particle size.…”
Section: Exposures To Rsp Ets Particles and Nicotinesupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In this publication, CEs are used solely for conceptual comparison of exposures between groups of nonsmokers. The factor (Ogden and Martin 1997) used to relate exposure of nonsmokers to that of smokers was not applied to the data.…”
Section: Exposures To Rsp Ets Particles and Nicotinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this publication, CEs are used solely for conceptual comparison of exposure between groups of nonsmokers. In this context the factor used to relate the exposure of nonsmokers to smokers (Ogden and Martin 1997) was not required. Daily exposures in terms of PIQs (in micrograms), calculated for each subject group (cell) over the 24-h monitoring period, are summarised in Table 7.…”
Section: Potential Inhaled Quantities Of Rsp Ets Particles and Nicotinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulator accepts uploaded data from the PDA and shows X-ray-style images of smoke-affected lungs. The visualisations are based on the commonly used metric of cigarette equivalency (Figures 8b, 9a, and 11a) (Repace, 1993;Redhead, 1995;Ogden and Martin, 1997;Quan, 1998;Foley-Fisher and Strohecker, in preparation).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%