1991
DOI: 10.1016/0098-7913(91)90039-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of citation data to evaluate serials subscriptions in an academic library

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study such as this one, where only one department was surveyed, care must be taken that journals are not canceled that are heavily used by other departments. Swigger and Wilkes (1991) found the majority of most heavily cited journals were not the most heavily used according to reshelving statistics. This result was confirmed in the academic library in a citation analysis of psychology and counseling Master's theses (Sylvia and Lesher, 1995).…”
Section: Deselection Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In a study such as this one, where only one department was surveyed, care must be taken that journals are not canceled that are heavily used by other departments. Swigger and Wilkes (1991) found the majority of most heavily cited journals were not the most heavily used according to reshelving statistics. This result was confirmed in the academic library in a citation analysis of psychology and counseling Master's theses (Sylvia and Lesher, 1995).…”
Section: Deselection Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Even if we locate the issue used, correct estimation of what is being used becomes tedious due to readers may consult many articles per issue and many issues per journal. Many studies have been done through citation analysis, interview survey methods to assess the use of print journals (Swigger and Wilkes, 1991; Sylvia and Lesher, 1995; Salisbury and Noguera, 2003; Tenopir and King, 2001; Talja and Maula, 2003). These methods are not adequate enough to give a true, comprehensive picture of the usage of print journals.…”
Section: Techniques For Quantifying Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly, several analysts [16][17][18] have used local citation analysis in combination with other techniques to estimate the actual or potential use of journals, without reporting that the citation analysis produced anomalous results. Comparing reshelving studies, professional judgement and local citation studies, Swigger and Wilkes [19] note that 'the citation method is the most reliable of the three'. More generally, Kelland and Young [20,21] have reviewed the literature on relating citation frequency with library use and concluded that the two are indeed related.…”
Section: User Requirements Use and Citationsmentioning
confidence: 99%