The Use of Digital Health Tools for Health Promotion Among Women With and Without Chronic Diseases: Insights From the 2017-2020 Health Information National Trends Survey

Abstract

Background In the United States, almost 90% of women are at risk of at least one chronic condition. However, the awareness, management, and monitoring of these conditions are low and present a substantial public health problem. Digital health tools can be leveraged to reduce the alarmingly high rates of chronic condition–related mortality and morbidity in women. Objective This study aimed to investigate the 4-year trend of digital health use for health promotion among women with chronic conditions in the United States. Methods Data for this study were obtained from the 2017 to 2020 iterations of the Health Information Trends Survey 5. Separate weighted logistic regression models were conducted to test the unadjusted and adjusted association of the study variables and each digital health use. The 95% CI, adjusted odds ratio (aOR), and P value (.05) were reported. Analysis was conducted using Stata 17 software. Results In total, 8573 women were included in this study. The weighted prevalence of the use of a smartphone or tablet for various activities were as follows: track health goals, 50.3% (95% CI 48.4%-52.2%; 3279/7122); make a health decision, 43.6% (95% CI 41.9%-45.3%; 2998/7101); and discuss with a provider, 40% (95% CI 38.2%-41.8%; 2834/7099). In the preceding 12 months, 33% (95% CI 30.9%-35.2%; 1395/4826) of women used an electronic wearable device, 18.7% (95% CI 17.3%-20.2%; 1532/7653) shared health information, and 35.2% (95% CI 33.2%-37.3%; 2262/6349) sent or received an SMS text message with a health professional. Between 2017 and 2020, the weighted prevalence of having 0, 1, and multiple chronic conditions were 37.4% (2718/8564), 33.4% (2776/8564), and 29.3% (3070/8564), respectively. However, slightly above half (52.2%, 95% CI 0.50%-0.53%; 4756/8564) of US women reported having at least one chronic disease. Women with multiple chronic conditions had higher odds of using their tablet or smartphone to achieve a health-related goal (aOR 1.43, 95% CI 1.16-1.77; P=.001) and discuss with their provider (aOR 1.55 95% CI 1.20-2.00; P=.001) than those without any chronic conditions. Correspondingly, in the past 12 months, the odds of using an electronic wearable device (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.00-1.96; P=.04), sharing health information (aOR 1.91, 95% CI 1.46-2.51; P<.001), and communicating via SMS text messaging with a provider (aOR 1.31, 95% CI 1.02-1.68; P=.03) were significantly higher among women with chronic conditions than those without a chronic condition. Conclusions This study suggests that women with chronic conditions accept and integrate digital health tools to manage their care. However, certain subpopulations experience a digital disconnect that may exacerbate existing health inequities. Implications for research and opportunities to leverage and integrate digital health tools to prevent, monitor, manage, and treat chronic conditions in women are discussed.

Mapping Factors That Affect the Uptake of Digital Therapeutics Within Health Systems: Scoping Review

“…Demographic characteristics are associated with patients’ uptake of digital therapeutics. Younger age [ 5 , 19 , 40 , 43 , 49 , 52 - 54 , 63 , 83 , 100 , 101 , 126 , 135 , 139 , 175 , 177 , 181 , 182 , 196 , 203 , 206 , 235 , 236 , 256 , 259 ], sex (male or female depending on the circumstances) [ 17 , 53 , 62 , 63 , 101 , 181 , 182 , 235 , 256 ], higher language skills [ 19 , 53 , 126 ], higher education level [ 5 , 17 , 43 , 49 , 54 , 62 , 63 , 83 , 100 , 101 , 107 , 135 , 175 , 177 , 181 , 182 ], higher health literacy [ 40 , 47 ], being employed [ 5 , 17 , 62 , 100 , 101 ], higher income level [ 17 , 40 , 52 , ...…”

Feasibility Study on Menstrual Cycles With Fitbit Device (FEMFIT): Prospective Observational Cohort Study

“…Data completeness may be further increased if a clear purpose for data collection is visible to participants, for example, having the clinical condition of interest in the study [ 52 , 53 ]. As this was a feasibility study without a specific disease focus, we expect retention and data completeness to be higher when applying a similar study setting to a clinical condition with a high disease burden, such as endometriosis [ 54 ]. Recruitment strategies should also be tailored to improve data completeness.…”

Association between patient-provider communication and withholding information due to privacy concerns among women in the United States: an analysis of the 2011 to 2018 Health Information National Trends Survey

“…Minoritized women experience racially motivated care, leading to medical distrust and worse health outcomes across several health indices, thus calling for culturally concordant care [ 11 ]. On the other hand, women with higher levels of education may have higher literacy and structural advantage of seeking information from alternative health sources, such as the internet [ 32 ], instead of disclosing PHIs if they perceive they are receiving poor quality health services. They may also have private/comprehensive health insurance to improve their access to quality health services [ 33 ].…”