2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2018.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Digital Side Markers (DSMs) and Cropping in Digital Radiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads us to question whether student radiographers (and perhaps qualified staff) are wholly examining all dependent features on a digital system. There has been acknowledgement that radiographers may be striving for aesthetically pleasing images in digital radiography, 27 thus with little attention to the EI value, this strengthens previous assertions that aesthetics of discerning image quality remains superior over optimal exposure delivery. If transferable in other contexts it raises an important issue for clinical and academic practitioners whereby alternate pedagogical and andragogical tools and assessments may be needed in order to ensure that students appreciate and reflect on the EI in clinical situations.…”
Section: Image Evaluation To Determine Appropriate Exposure Factorssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This leads us to question whether student radiographers (and perhaps qualified staff) are wholly examining all dependent features on a digital system. There has been acknowledgement that radiographers may be striving for aesthetically pleasing images in digital radiography, 27 thus with little attention to the EI value, this strengthens previous assertions that aesthetics of discerning image quality remains superior over optimal exposure delivery. If transferable in other contexts it raises an important issue for clinical and academic practitioners whereby alternate pedagogical and andragogical tools and assessments may be needed in order to ensure that students appreciate and reflect on the EI in clinical situations.…”
Section: Image Evaluation To Determine Appropriate Exposure Factorssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This is a reminder that diagnostic radiography remains both an art and science, where subjectivity is central to the practice development of student radiographers. 27 Students aim to 'do well' and keep doses 'as low as reasonably achievable', yet they identify and witness complacencies when supervised. This may be important to understand further as it would seem that the development of 'bad habits' amongst clinical supervisors may creep into everyday practices.…”
Section: Future Impact As a Qualified Radiographermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An observational study from the United Kingdom found that radiographers collimated/cropped images at the post-processing stage with collimation/cropping ranging from 1 cm to 5 cm. 39 Increasing the irradiated area outside the area of interest contributes to radiation dose and impedes image quality. 40 A contrast in responses from a participant's "yes" P6 to radiation protection practices being evident to an upset and emotional participant's story elucidates the spectrum of radiation protection practices in South Africa: "So you see, I have seen something just here that really upset me actually ….…”
Section: P11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, if the prescribed hygiene measures are not adhered to, the ASM can act therefore as a superspreader. Since hygienically cleaning the ASM after each use significantly affects the workflow, digital side markers (DSM) could therefore act as an alternative 13 . While DSM were already in common use, they were only considered recently during the COVID-19 pandemic as good practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%