The use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults: a systematic literature review

Abstract

BackgroundThe use of e-health and m-health technologies in health promotion and primary prevention among older people is largely unexplored. This study provides a systematic review of the evidence on the scope of the use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults (age 50+).MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted in October 2015. The search for relevant publications was done in the search engine PubMed. The key inclusion criteria were: e-health and m-health tools used, participants’ age 50+ years, focus on health promotion and primary prevention, published in the past 10 years, in English, and full-paper can be obtained. The text of the publications was analyzed based on two themes: the characteristics of e-health and m-health tools and the determinants of the use of these tools by older adults. The quality of the studies reviewed was also assessed.ResultsThe initial search resulted in 656 publications. After we applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 45 publications were selected for the review. In the publications reviewed, various types of e-health/m-health tools were described, namely apps, websites, devices, video consults and webinars. Most of the publications (60 %) reported studies in the US. In 37 % of the publications, the study population was older adults in general, while the rest of the publications studied a specific group of older adults (e.g. women or those with overweight). The publications indicated various facilitators and barriers. The most commonly mentioned facilitator was the support for the use of the e-health/m-health tools that the older adults received.ConclusionsE-health and m-health tools are used by older adults in diverse health promotion programs, but also outside formal programs to monitor and improve their health. The latter is hardly studied. The successful use of e-health/m-health tools in health promotion programs for older adults greatly depends on the older adults’ motivation and support that older adults receive when using e-health and m-health tools.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1522-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Systematic review of technology‐based interventions to improve anxiety, depression, and health‐related quality of life among patients with prostate cancer

“…Our findings are consistent with the results from a previous systematic review of TBIs that showed that little studies monitored intervention dose (number of log on and website exploration) and its influence on HRQoL among breast and prostate cancer patients . Maintaining intervention use over time during study is a major moderator of TBI effectiveness and is likely to influence participants' long‐term health outcomes . In this review, participant retention rates between baseline and the end of follow‐up were considered high, ranging from 73 to 94% .…”

“…Professional support in TBIs could provide information, guidance, and assistance for users regarding their symptoms management . The lack of guidance and assistance by health professionals is a substantial barrier to the use of TBIs among elderly people (eg, prostate cancer patients), while health care providers' guidance and assistance have resulted in more enhanced self‐management in patients with chronic conditions than TBI access alone . Similarly, Seiler and colleagues found in a systematic review that therapist‐guided TBIs were more efficacious than self‐guided interventions .…”

“…8 Maintaining intervention use over time during study is a major moderator of TBI effectiveness 34 and is likely to influence participants' long-term health outcomes. 28,35,36 In this review, participant retention rates between baseline and the end of follow-up were considered high, ranging from 73 to 94%. 37 The retention rate, however, reflects the percentage of participants retained for postintervention assessments, but not necessar- Amid growing concerns regarding barriers to continuous TBI use among patients with chronic illness patients and how to overcome these barriers, 36 investigators have commented on the importance of developing assessment tools to explore facilitators and barriers to maintaining TBIs engagement.…”

A systematic review of reviews to identify key research opportunities within the field of eHealth implementation

“…A lack of sustained and sufficient funding from stakeholders such as governing bodies e.g. the government [33] indirectly affect the quality of service that healthcare providers can provide to their patients. A further problem, agreeing on reimbursement [24], can be a challenge for new technologies especially as they are of unproven value [7] as well as when some technologies are initially viewed as too expensive to integrate into everyday clinical practice [31].…”

A randomized wait-list control trial to evaluate the impact of a mobile application to improve self-management of individuals with type 2 diabetes: a study protocol

“…E-Health solutions are increasingly common in healthcare, and involve the use of an electronic device or monitoring system by individuals or their healthcare providers to monitor or improve their health status [1]. Well-designed e-Health solutions for diabetes management targeting health behaviour change can improve a range of measures, including improvements in glycemic control, perceived health, and a reduction in hospitalizations [2, 3].…”