2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy with segmented electrodes to study inhibition at the cut-edge of coil-coated systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anodic and cathodic inhibition was evaluated by comparison of the charge transfer resistance values obtained through fitting the equivalent circuit to the impedance plots, Fig. 1 3 . It can be seen that inhibition occurs immediately (within 1 hour) at the steel cathode, whereas differences between the charge transfer resistance at the uninhibited and inhibited zinc anode were minor and relatively delayed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anodic and cathodic inhibition was evaluated by comparison of the charge transfer resistance values obtained through fitting the equivalent circuit to the impedance plots, Fig. 1 3 . It can be seen that inhibition occurs immediately (within 1 hour) at the steel cathode, whereas differences between the charge transfer resistance at the uninhibited and inhibited zinc anode were minor and relatively delayed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically for this class of inhibitor, SAPP was found to be sparingly soluble; measurements were obtained from saturated solutions containing < 50 ppm SAPP by weight when dissolved into 3.5 wt % NaCl electrolyte. A four-electrode cell was used and attached to an ACM Gill AC Weld Tester instrument, utilising the steel and zinc as two working electrodes, a saturated calomel reference electrode and a platinum counter electrode, as described in detail previously 3 . Impedance measurements were taken at the measured system coupled potential in the frequency range of 10,000 to 0.01 Hz with a signal amplitude of 10 mV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further increase in temperature to 333 K rapidly reduced the efficiency to a negative value. Negative inhibition efficiency has also been observed for other inhibitors at high temperatures, e.g., Combretum bracteosum [49], magnesium aluminum polyphosphate [51], Glutmatic acid [52], and Oxyanion Esters of Α-Hydroxy Acids [53]. A negative inhibition efficiency could be caused by the deterioration of inhibitor molecules at high temperatures and formation of adsorbed intermediates that are less protective [42,49,54,55].…”
Section: Effect Of Temperaturementioning
confidence: 97%