The use of electronic healthcare records for colorectal cancer screening referral decisions and risk prediction model development

Abstract

Background The database used for the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) derives participant information from primary care records. Combining predictors with FOBTs has shown to improve referral decisions and accuracy. The richer data available from GP databases could be used to complement screening referral decisions by identifying those at greatest risk of colorectal cancer. We determined the availability of data for key predictors and whether this information could be used to inform more accurate screening referral decisions. Methods An English BCSP cohort was derived using the electronic notifications received from the BCSP database to GP records. The cohort covered a period between 13th May 2009 to 17th January 2017. Completeness of variables and univariable associations were assessed. Risk prediction models were developed using Cox regression and multivariable fractional polynomials with backwards elimination. Optimism adjusted performance metrics were reported. The sensitivity and specificity of a combined approach using the negative FOBT model plus FOBT positive patients was determined using a probability equivalent to a 3% PPV NICE guidelines level. Results 292,059 participants aged 60–74 were derived for the BCSP screening cohort. A model including the screening test result had a C-statistic of 0.860, c-slope of 0.997, and R2 of 0.597. A model developed for negative screening results only had a C-statistic of 0.597, c-slope of 0.940, and R2 of 0.062. Risk predictors included in the models included; age, sex, alcohol consumption, IBS diagnosis, family history of gastrointestinal cancer, smoking status, previous negatives and whether a GP had ordered a blood test. For the combined screening approach, sensitivity increased slightly from 53.90% (FOBT only) to 58.82% but at the expense of an increased referral rate. Conclusions This research has identified several potential predictors for CRC in a BCSP population. A risk prediction model developed for BCSP FOBT negative patients was not clinically useful due to a low sensitivity and increased referral rate. The predictors identified in this study should be investigated in a refined algorithm combining the quantitative FIT result. Combining data from multiple sources enables fuller patient profiles using the primary care and screening database interface.

Correlation between immunity from BCG and the morbidity and mortality of COVID-19

“…Considering the high morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 in the elderly, a possible protective effect through BCG in this group would invariably be of clinical significance. Nevertheless, ecological studies conducted so far have failed to establish this relationship [10]. It could be that these studies have all used a single indicator to depict immunity from BCG, which is commonly the population coverage of BCG vaccination.…”

Individualized faecal immunochemical test cut-off based on age and sex in colorectal cancer screening

“…Future studies should also evaluate combinations of other risk factors, for example including FIT concentrations in previous screening rounds ( Chen et al, 2011 , Grobbee et al, 2017 ). Others have proposed to use data from medical records for screening, although privacy rights and regulations may form an obstacle ( Cooper et al, 2020 ).…”

A diagnostic prediction model for colorectal cancer in elderlies via internet of medical things

“…It was revealed that VH-based interference can effect users’ determinations outside of a laboratory environment. In [ 9 ], several potential predictors for CRC were recognized in a selected population of aged people using the interface among the screening database and primary care records. The authors observed that the considered predictors can be considered in a refined risk prediction model merging the newer quantitative FIT for bowel cancer screening.…”

“…It was revealed that VH-based interference can effect users' determinations outside of a laboratory environment. In [9], several potential predictors for CRC were recognized in a selected population of aged people using the interface among the screening database and primary care records.…”