2008
DOI: 10.1177/0310057x0803600114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Epidural Analgesia in a New Zealand Tertiary Hospital before and after Publication of the Master Study

Abstract: We audited the total number of perioperative epidural techniques performed at Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand, for three years, before and after The Lancet published the MASTER Anaesthesia Trial in 2002. We also looked specifically at the number of epidural anaesthetic and analgesic techniques performed in combination with general anaesthesia for colonic surgery over the same period. In both cases we found a statistically significant fall in epidural rate in the years after the publication (P<0.001). A subs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, most adverse morbid outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery are not reduced by use of a combined epidural and general anesthesia technique, the improvement in analgesia and reduction in respiratory failure and the low risk of serious adverse events makes it likely that high-risk patients undergoing major intra-abdominal surgery will benefit from this combination technique [ 26 , 27 ]. Nevertheless, after the publication of the MASTER study, the use of this combination of techniques has declined in some parts of the world [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, most adverse morbid outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery are not reduced by use of a combined epidural and general anesthesia technique, the improvement in analgesia and reduction in respiratory failure and the low risk of serious adverse events makes it likely that high-risk patients undergoing major intra-abdominal surgery will benefit from this combination technique [ 26 , 27 ]. Nevertheless, after the publication of the MASTER study, the use of this combination of techniques has declined in some parts of the world [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of an epidural has not been shown to significantly affect the length of hospital stay but does produce better postoperative pain control, a decrease in paralytic ileus, a decrease in respiratory complications, and metabolic benefits, when compared with parenteral opioids after colorectal surgery [19–21]. The use of epidural analgesia may have fallen out of favour after publication of the MASTER trial results [22]. TAP blockade has shown potential for analgesia alone but there have been no studies comparing this route directly with epidural analgesia after abdominal surgery [23,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recently examined pain service audit and clinical coding data in a New Zealand Tertiary Hospital for the 3 years before and after the MASTER study [3]. We excluded obstetric epidurals from our dataset.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%