2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2012.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of epitope arrays in immunodiagnosis of infectious disease: Hepatitis C virus, a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As requested by CDC, the second assay is imperative to circumvent the false-positive bias of ELISA and confirm the diagnostic result, , such as recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA). It is also a serologic immunoassay for IgG antibody but employs multiple individual antigens to report a reaction pattern, thus inherently providing a higher level of specificity than ELISA. , However, its routine utilization might be hampered by high cost (at least 2-fold that of ELISA), low sensitivity, and long assay time (6–7 h) . Most importantly, the segmented clinical pathway itself might be a major reason to hinder the effective delivery of diagnosis by adding diagnostic complexity, delaying turnaround time and increasing office visits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As requested by CDC, the second assay is imperative to circumvent the false-positive bias of ELISA and confirm the diagnostic result, , such as recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA). It is also a serologic immunoassay for IgG antibody but employs multiple individual antigens to report a reaction pattern, thus inherently providing a higher level of specificity than ELISA. , However, its routine utilization might be hampered by high cost (at least 2-fold that of ELISA), low sensitivity, and long assay time (6–7 h) . Most importantly, the segmented clinical pathway itself might be a major reason to hinder the effective delivery of diagnosis by adding diagnostic complexity, delaying turnaround time and increasing office visits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The murine anti-gp120 mAb CG10, which stringently recognizes the CD4i conformation of gp120 [ 14 , 17 , 38 , 39 ], the murine anti-gp120 mAbs LG4 (targets a conserved epitope at the carboxy-terminus of gp120), 9G3 and 1B6 [ 85 ], the murine anti-CD4 mAb CG9 [ 14 ], the murine anti-M13 Y2D mAb [ 86 ] and the rabbit polyclonal anti-M13 serum were produced at Tel Aviv University. The human anti-gp120 mAb N12-i15, which stringently recognizes the CD4i conformation of gp120, was produced at the Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA, USA [ 15 , 25 , 40 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The human mAbs 80R (Sui et al, 2004) and 11A (Sui et al, 2008), which target the RBD of the SARS CoV, and the human ACE2 protein were produced at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA. Polyclonal rabbit anti-M13 sera and the recombinant pVIII-specific GIL-Ab (Kaplan and Gershoni, 2012) as well as the anti-m13 mAb Y2D (Siman-Tov et al, 2013) were produced at Tel Aviv University.…”
Section: Monoclonal Antibodies and Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%