The use of fibrin adhesive in sinus lift procedures

Sullivan, Steven M.; Bulard, Ronald A.; Meaders, Richard; Patterson, M. K.

doi:10.1016/s1079-2104(97)90361-9

Cited by 26 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Various methods have been proposed for clinically treating a perforation of the schneiderian membrane, including suturing, fibrin glue, cyanoacrylate adhesive, and coverage using buccal fat pad flap and collagen membrane (Choi et al, ; Fugazzotto & Vlassis, ; Kim et al, ; Pikos, ; Pikos, ; Proussaefs & Lozada, ; Sullivan et al, ). Among these methods, the placement of a collagen membrane on the perforation is most widely used and has demonstrated successful clinical outcomes in humans (Proussaefs & Lozada, ; Testori et al, ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Current techniques to manage perforation of the schneiderian membrane include direct suturing, fibrin glue, cyanoacrylate adhesive, and coverage using buccal fat pad flap and collagen membrane (Choi et al, ; Fugazzotto & Vlassis, ; Kim, Hwang, & Yun, ; Pikos, ; Proussaefs & Lozada, ; Sullivan, Bulard, Meaders, & Patterson, ). Several studies have reported histologic results of the sinus augmentation with a repaired schneiderian membrane from humans.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Sinus floor elevation in sites with a perforated schneiderian membrane: What is the effect of placing a collagen membrane in a rabbit model?

Lim

Son

Hong

et al. 2018

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To investigate the healing following sinus grafting in sites with a perforated schneiderian membrane repaired using a collagen membrane, compared to control sites without membrane perforation. Materials & Methods Following elevation of the sinus membrane in 16 rabbits, each sinus was assigned to one of the following groups: (a) intentional schneiderian membrane perforation, followed by the placement of a collagen membrane and bone grafting (group SMP) and (b) bone grafting without a perforation of the schneiderian membrane and without a collagen membrane placement (control group). At 2 and 4 weeks (n = 8 for each time‐point), microcomputed tomographic (micro‐CT) and histomorphometric analyses were performed. Results Overall new bone formation in group SMP was significantly delayed compared to the control group at 2 and 4 weeks (1.58 ± 1.25% vs. 9.23 ± 2.69% at 2 weeks, 10.43 ± 3.55 vs. 17.86 ± 4.11% at 4 weeks, p < 0.05). At 2 weeks, new bone formation for the areas close to lateral (1.19 ± 2.02%) and medial sinus bone walls (3.17 ± 1.98%) was markedly delayed in group SMP compared to the control group (13.08 ± 6.13% and 12.75 ± 5.63%, respectively, p < 0.05), but there was no statistical difference in those areas at 4 weeks (p > 0.05). The augmented volumes at 2 and 4 weeks were not statistically significantly different in both groups. Conclusion The perforation of the schneiderian membrane and the repair using a collagen membrane delayed new bone formation in the augmented sinuses. However, the extension of the collagen membrane on the sinus bone walls was also attributable to this delayed bone formation.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sinus floor elevation in sites with a perforated schneiderian membrane: What is the effect of placing a collagen membrane in a rabbit model?

Lim

Son

Hong

et al. 2018

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The previously mentioned techniques for membrane repair can be problematic and unpredictable for both large perforations and membranes with complete tears. [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] Suturing is not possible because the membrane edges cannot be approximated. In addition, these membranes can be thin and will tear upon suturing.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…8,9,24 -26 A variety of techniques have been proposed to manage these perforations. These include suturing, 27,28 the use of collagen membranes, 9,27-31 fibrin sealants, [32][33][34][35] freeze dried human lamellar bone sheets, 27,28,36 and oxidized regenerated cellulose. 37 All these techniques involve repair of sinus membrane perforations that range in size from 2 mm to approximately 1.5 cm with one exception.…”

Section: Maxillary Sinus Membrane Perforation and Repairmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maxillary Sinus Membrane Repair: Update on Technique for Large and Complete Perforations

Pikos¹

2008

Implant Dentistry

141

178

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Maxillary sinus membrane perforation is the most common complication that occurs with sinus elevation augmentation surgery. A technique using a slow resorbing type I collagen membrane for repair of large and complete sinus membrane perforations is described. The biocompatibility and semirigid structural integrity of this membrane, along with external tack fixation, allows for optimal membrane stabilization and maintenance.

show abstract

“…Has limited availability Smiler and Holmes 17 reported a series of 5 successful subantral grafts performed via a lateral window approach using porous hydroxylapatite alone as the graft material. Many articles describe using allografts, 18 xenografts, 19 or alloplasts 20 combined with the patient's blood, platelet-rich plasma, 21,22 aqueous antibiotics, 23 sterile saline, 24 or bone marrow aspirate. 25,26 The authors believe that an alloplastic material that has the morphologic architecture of trabecular bone, which completely resorbs and absorbs blood, is replaced by the host bone and, when combined with fresh bone marrow aspirate, is the best composite alternative to autogenous bone graft.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Crestal Approach: Antral Membrane Elevation Via a Post Graft

Soltan¹,

Smiler²,

Ghostine

et al. 2011

Implant Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The crestal approach to elevating the antral membrane by a resorbable StemVie Post is a modification of the sinus lift technique. This technique can add 4 to 10 mm bone height for severely atrophic ridges in areas that are difficult to access through a lateral window. The procedure is minimally invasive, simple, predictable, and has less postoperative morbidity because of smaller flap design and minimal osteotomy. If sufficient alveolar bone is present for stabilization, an implant can be placed simultaneous with antral elevation and graft. The StemVie Post completely resorbs and is replaced by the patient's own bone.

show abstract

The use of fibrin adhesive in sinus lift procedures

Cited by 26 publications

References 32 publications

Sinus floor elevation in sites with a perforated schneiderian membrane: What is the effect of placing a collagen membrane in a rabbit model?

Sinus floor elevation in sites with a perforated schneiderian membrane: What is the effect of placing a collagen membrane in a rabbit model?

Maxillary Sinus Membrane Repair: Update on Technique for Large and Complete Perforations

The Crestal Approach: Antral Membrane Elevation Via a Post Graft

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About