2006
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-89132006000200004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of fricke dosimetry for low energy x-rays

Abstract: The performance of four X-ray qualities generated in a Pantak X-ray machine operating at

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This should reduce the total errors below 8% for a submillimetric irradiation field at 1.28 keV. This latter value compares well with the metrological errors determined in liquid Fricke dosimetry for centimetric irradiation field (3-4%), keeping in mind that these errors actually increase when the irradiation field size decreases (Austerlitz et al, 2006). Owing to these errors, the use of liquid dosimeters to map irradiation fields have indeed been limited to macroscopic ones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This should reduce the total errors below 8% for a submillimetric irradiation field at 1.28 keV. This latter value compares well with the metrological errors determined in liquid Fricke dosimetry for centimetric irradiation field (3-4%), keeping in mind that these errors actually increase when the irradiation field size decreases (Austerlitz et al, 2006). Owing to these errors, the use of liquid dosimeters to map irradiation fields have indeed been limited to macroscopic ones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Fricke's solution was used to compare the absorption dose of CP films containing M‐Qu complex to analyze X‐ray radiation absorption capability. The Fe 2+ in the Fricke solution was converted to Fe 3+ using X‐ray energy, 32 and the radiation absorption efficiency was confirmed by measuring the dose change caused by the MQCP film before the X‐ray energy reached the Fricke solution (Figure 7a). X‐ray energy was generated at a voltage of 320 kV and a current of 5 mA in the irradiator, and the MQCP films and Fricke solution samples were irradiated for 1 h. Subsequently, the absorbance of each Fricke solution after X‐ray irradiation was measured at 304 nm to compare the dose‐change rates of the MQCP films.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Fricke dosimetry method can be used as a primary standard for MeV electrons (Feist 1982, McEwen et al 2014 and the Federal Office of Metrology (METAS, Switzerland) has great experience with this application (Stucki et al 2003a, 2003b, Vörös et al 2012. Furthermore, Fricke detectors have been used as secondary standards for several different applications in photon and electron beams as well as in x-rays (Nahum and Greening 1978, Kuszpet et al 1982, Feist and Muller 1989, Palm and Mattsson 2002, Austerlitz et al 2006, Moussous et al 2011, deAlmeida et al 2014, Moussous and Medjadj 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%