2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of grey-based methods in multi-criteria decision analysis for the evaluation of sustainable energy systems: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(162 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitatively, a Grey relational analysis (GRA) was conducted to examine these six factors' correlation to the water level variation. GRA is a measure of the difference between data sequences and can be used to analyze the degree of correlation between these sequences [38]. Let the reference sequence and sequence for comparison be represented as x o (k) and x i (k), i = 1, 2, ..., 6; k = 1, 2, ..., n, respectively, where n is the total number of observations.…”
Section: Variable Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitatively, a Grey relational analysis (GRA) was conducted to examine these six factors' correlation to the water level variation. GRA is a measure of the difference between data sequences and can be used to analyze the degree of correlation between these sequences [38]. Let the reference sequence and sequence for comparison be represented as x o (k) and x i (k), i = 1, 2, ..., 6; k = 1, 2, ..., n, respectively, where n is the total number of observations.…”
Section: Variable Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a comparison of the results reveals that the main evaluation criteria are similar. Wang et al [25] also observe a comparable occurrence of criteria in their review on MCDA aid in sustainable energy decision-making, whereas Arce et al [28] find similar criteria, but with different occurrences. Contrary to our findings, though, technical efficiency criteria are relatively often used in the papers appeared in the review by Arce et al [28] whereas only one social criterion, called the human/technological impact, is included in their list.…”
Section: Ren Et Al [15]mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, and due to this wider research focus, the review papers discussed above are neither able nor do they intend to provide a comparison of the results obtained. Accordingly, the list of evaluation criteria found in Wang et al [25] and Arce et al [28] are formed from papers with a much broader study range than ours. The particular scope of our analysis allows us to compare the study setups and results of similar papers.…”
Section: Overview Of Other Similar Literature Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The weight of each criterion plays an important role in the MCDM process, since it reflects the importance over others and, therefore, influences the final decision-making. Consequently, it is common to use a separate MCDM method to deal with the weighting of criteria [30][31][32].…”
Section: Prosmentioning
confidence: 99%