The Use of Head-Worn Displays for Vital Sign Monitoring in Critical and Acute Care: Systematic Review

Abstract

Background Continuous monitoring of patient vital signs may improve patient outcomes. Head-worn displays (HWDs) can provide hands-free access to continuous vital sign information of patients in critical and acute care contexts and thus may reduce instances of unrecognized patient deterioration. Objective The purpose of the study is to conduct a systematic review of the literature to evaluate clinical, surrogate, and process outcomes when clinicians use HWDs for continuous patient vital sign monitoring. Methods The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019119875) and followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. A literature search was conducted for articles published between January 1995 and June 2020 using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Overall, 2 reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and then assessed the full text of the articles. Original research articles that evaluated the clinical, surrogate, or process outcomes of head-mounted displays for continuous vital sign monitoring in critical care or acute care contexts were included. Results Of the 214 records obtained, 15 (7%) articles met the predefined criteria and were included in this review. Of the 15 studies, 7 (47%) took place in a clinical context, whereas the remainder took place in a simulation environment. In 100% (7/7) of the studies that evaluated gaze behavior, changes were found in gaze direction with HWDs. Change detection improvements were found in 67% (2/3) of the studies evaluating changes in the participants’ ability to detect changes in vital signs. Of the 10 studies assessing the ease of use of the HWD, most participants of 7 (70%) studies reported that the HWD was easy to use. In all 6 studies in which participants were asked if they would consider using the HWD in their practice, most participants responded positively, but they often suggested improvements on the HWD hardware or display design. Of the 7 studies conducted in clinical contexts, none reported any clinical outcomes. Conclusions Although there is limited and sometimes conflicting evidence about the benefits of HWDs from certain surrogate and process outcomes, evidence for clinical outcomes is lacking. Recommendations are to employ user-centered design when developing HWDs, perform longitudinal studies, and seek clinical outcomes. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42019119875; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=119875

Vital signs and medical emergency response (MER) activation predict in‐hospital mortality in general surgery patients: a study of 15 969 admissions

“…Novel strategies for vital sign monitoring, such as the use of head-worn displays, could be considered. 14 For the consideration of technologies to assist with monitoring of general surgery patients, human factors must be considered and responsibility shared. 15 Given high accuracy in anticipating deterioration, nurse monitoring is likely to retain an important role in observations on inpatient surgical wards.…”

“…If validated in future research, this could confer benefits to perioperative outcomes and efficiency of care for patients admitted under general surgical services. Novel strategies for vital sign monitoring, such as the use of head‐worn displays, could be considered 14 . For the consideration of technologies to assist with monitoring of general surgery patients, human factors must be considered and responsibility shared 15 .…”

Attention to Changes on a Head-Worn Display: Two Preclinical Studies with Healthcare Scenarios

“…Most prior research has focused on the use of HWDs to provide imagery and augmented reality support during surgery (Rahman et al, 2020). However there is also considerable interest in using HWDs to display a patient's vital signs-see the recent reviews by Elrose et al (2021) and Andrade et al (2021). For singlepatient monitoring, HWDs can help clinicians detect patient deterioration faster and look directly towards the patient for longer than when they rely on external monitors alone (Liu et al, 2009b(Liu et al, , 2010(Liu et al, , 2009c Outside the operating room, clinicians may need to track the status of multiple continuously monitored patients.…”

Novel ways to analyse and cope alert-fatigue phenomenon in intensive care units

“…This phenomenon has increased over time and has accelerated in recent years because of the transformative shift through the advent of the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT), establishing a complex system of patient monitoring mechanisms marked by precision and accuracy [2,3]. Within the IoMT framework, devices actively engage in the real-time collection of physiological data, enabling the meticulous analysis of intricate physiological patterns [4][5][6][7][8][9]. This process is further facilitated by integrating event processing (EP), a sophisticated analytical approach centered on meticulously examining event-related information to draw meaningful inferences.…”