2008
DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2008.081005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of historical controls and concurrent controls to assess the effects of sulphonamides, 1936–1945

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite of these facts, the HCTs has been widely applied in medical clinical research [713]. In randomized trials, factors such as age, race, and gender, that may be confounded with treatment effects are balanced with respect to their marginal or joint frequencies in the control and experimental groups through randomization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite of these facts, the HCTs has been widely applied in medical clinical research [713]. In randomized trials, factors such as age, race, and gender, that may be confounded with treatment effects are balanced with respect to their marginal or joint frequencies in the control and experimental groups through randomization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These dramatic effects of sulphonamides were not observed in other conditions, however, and carefully controlled trials were required to distinguish confidently between moderate treatment effects and no material effects. 2 To help us think about the circumstances in which randomised trials are unnecessary, we sought help 3 in compiling a list of examples of treatments whose effects had been widely accepted on the basis of evidence from case series or non-randomised cohorts (box). We have considered three present day examples in more detail to help illustrate the basis for our conclusions:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, several well-designed and analysed trials of sulphonamides were done by Snodgrass and Anderson at the Ruchill Hospital in Glasgow during the late 1930s. [31][32][33][34][35] The first of these (Snodgrass and Anderson 33 ) was reported by them as having been 'undertaken at the request of the Therapeutic Trials Committee of the Medical Research Council'. It employed alternate controls and included analyses using chi-square values and standard errors.…”
Section: Part 2: Methodological Aspects Of the Work Of The Mrc Therapmentioning
confidence: 99%