The Use of Hyaluronic Acid in Non-surgical Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Complications, Clinical, and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Mortada, Hatan; Korb, Alexa; Mawdsley, Edward; Suresh, Jonathan; Xu, Joshua; Koorapaty, Piyush; Khajuria, Ankur

doi:10.1007/s00266-023-03386-z

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Additionally, a system review by Mortada, et al that included 23 papers showed that the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers for NSR resulted in high patient satisfaction and a low rate of complications [19]. Furthermore, the study also noted that although NSR can be a good replacement for SR, it may not be suitable for all cases as its uses are limited to fixing and reshaping minor nasal deformities and dorsal irregularities [19]. Furthermore, He et al stated that improper injection can lead to serious implications for patients' physical and psychological health, and it was found that some patients required surgical curettage to remove the failed injected material to achieve satisfaction and a better quality of life [12].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…16,[18][19][20] NRCT: Non-randomised clinical trial; N/A: Not applicable; HA: Hyaluronic acid; NSR: Non-surgical rhinoplasty; SR: Surgical rhinoplasty…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Non-surgical Rhinoplasty (NSR): A Systematic Review of Its Techniques, Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction

Al-Taie,

AlEdani,

Gurramkonda

et al. 2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Surgical rhinoplasty (SR), commonly known as nose job, is a widely practiced cosmetic surgery globally, aimed at addressing diverse aesthetic and functional concerns related to the nose. In recent years, non-surgical rhinoplasty (NSR) has gained popularity due to advanced techniques involving hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers, offering advantages such as affordability, reduced side effects, and faster results. However, concerns persist about the suitability of dermal fillers for nasal anatomy and potential complications, prompting this comprehensive review. This study systematically evaluated the techniques, fillers, safety, and patient satisfaction associated with NSR, with the intent of providing valuable insights for clinicians and patients considering NSR or SR for improved aesthetic outcomes. The literature search, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria, yielded 16 relevant studies from an initial pool of 1002 articles. These studies covered various aspects of NSR, including techniques, complications, limitations, and positive results. In conclusion, NSR appears to be a quick and safe option for addressing minor nose shape issues, particularly through the use of HA fillers, but further discussion and standardization are necessary to address risks and limitations. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) using photographic evidence could significantly propel the progress of this evolving treatment. RCTs offer an optimal method to assess NSR's adverse effects and overall outcomes by allowing controlled comparisons between treatment and control groups. This approach minimizes biases and generates reliable statistical data, which is critical for evaluating safety, efficacy, and potential risks, thereby guiding informed clinical decisions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%